Benefits Of Estrogen Shouldn't Be Overlooked, USC Physician Says
Main Category: MenopauseAlso Included In: Cardiovascular / Cardiology; Endocrinology
Article Date: 17 Feb 2006 - 21:00 PST
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.75 (12 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Results released this week from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial clarifies estrogen's role in protecting women from heart attacks. A USC medical researcher encourages women and doctors not to dismiss hormone therapy as the research continues to sort out mixed results from the last few years.
"It remains a very active area for women's research - it's a very unsettled area, and the trials to date show differing outcomes," says Howard N. Hodis, MD, director of the atherosclerosis research unit in the Keck School of Medicine of USC. In the meantime, women can still find benefits from taking hormones, including the relief of menopausal symptoms, preserving bone density and reducing risk of diabetes, even if their long-term benefits and risks are still being clarified.
"Are there risks? Yes, like any other medication, but they're not great enough to create panic and make everyone using hormones get off them," he says.
An article published in the Feb. 13 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine concludes that estrogen therapy does not appear to raise or reduce the risk of heart attack in healthy postmenopausal women overall, but it does appear to lower the risk of heart disease in women aged 50 to 59 years. These results are consistent with a previous trial conducted at USC and dozens of previous observational studies conducted over several decades, Hodis says.
However, the popularity of hormone replacement therapy dropped dramatically after a WHI study of estrogen-only therapy was cut short in 2003 when it appeared to increase the risk of stroke in women aged 50 to 79 who had had hysterectomies. After that study, much of the other data that showed a benefit was set aside, and women were advised to avoid hormone replacement therapy - a recommendation that Hodis says was unnecessary.
One problem with ruling out estrogen for everyone based on the WHI study, as some doctors have done, is that the findings aren't the same for women of different ages and risk groups.
"To get a cardiovascular benefit, it appears that hormone therapy may need to be started within six years of menopause, and continued for 10 or more years, a theory that we are currently studying," Hodis says. "So women who have recently experienced menopause and starting taking estrogen right away may derive the most benefit."
Other trials of an estrogen-progestin combination therapy, including a WHI trial, have found that it reduces the risk of developing diabetes by up to 30 percent. It remains to be seen if estrogen alone has this same benefit, he says.
Hodis is among those participating in the effort to clarify the benefits of hormones. He is leading the National Institutes of Health funded trial of estrogen called ELITE (Early vs. Late Intervention Trial of Estradiol) to see how effective it is in slowing the hardening of arteries, the earliest stage of heart disease, in healthy post-menopausal women. He is hoping to determine whether the benefit depends on how soon after menopause women begin taking the hormones.
University of Southern California
1975 Zonal Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90033
http://www.usc.edu
Visit our menopause section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/37939.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/37939.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Current Estrogen Research.
posted by Jonathan R. on 17 Feb 2006 at 9:42 pmI'll emphasize YET AGAIN, that this dismissal of the significance of WHI and all other clinical trials by 'experts' and proponents of estrogen is very irresponsible. They poke holes in randomized controlled trials, THE gold standard of research, and instead put all their emphasis on past observational studies, which can never prove cause and effect.
What's more, there have been numerous interventions viewed as helpful in the past that were disproven by randomzied trials, such as vitamin E and fiber for colon cancer. While they may have been discouraging, the data sank in and people looked at why their past reasoning may have been flawed. This has NOT been the case with HRT. First it was thought hormones would help the 'sickest' women, those with established heart disease. That theory flunked with the results of HERS I and II. Then the thinking shifted to the notion that healthy women would benefit. After WHI disproved THAT theory, researchers took up the idea that the healthy women really must have been sick after all or they were just plain "too old" because higher RISKS not benefits were seen from hormones. So they've skewed an insignificant finding from the e-alone trial to support their argument that estrogen benefits womens' hearts. Unfortunately, you can't keep manipulating data and pushing for more trials just to get the results you WANT. Ultimately, it's women who lose out! It's quite laughable and counterintuitive to think a drug is going to prevent the same disease that it EXACERBATES once it exists. Is this a real scientific quest for truth or is it really a last ditch to attempt to revive the lagging estrogen market? But hey, I guess money does make the world go round!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




