16-Year Follow-up Study Reinforces Betaseron Long-term Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability In Multiple Sclerosis
Main Category: Multiple SclerosisArticle Date: 08 Apr 2006 - 22:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.56 (9 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Berlex has announced that Betaseron® (interferon beta 1b) remained consistently safe, effective and well tolerated over the long term, according to results of the Betaseron 16-Year Long-Term Follow-up (16-Year LTF) Study presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. This is the longest follow-up study for any disease modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Patients with relapsing forms of MS taking Betaseron (known as Betaferon® outside the US) had a sustained reduction in the annual rate of relapses of up to 40 percent over 16 years.
The data also showed that patients remaining on long-term Betaseron treatment had a slower disease progression compared to patients who did not. Among the patients who reached EDSS level 6.0 (e.g., needing a cane for walking), those on long-term Betaseron treatment reached EDSS 6.0 after a median time of 13 years compared to seven years for patients on short-term treatment. Long-term treatment was defined as use of Betaseron for more than 80 percent of the time since the start of the pivotal trial (approx. 12 years or longer), while short-term treatment was defined as use for less than 10 percent of the time (approx. 1.6 years or less). The impact of long-term treatment on disease progression is being studied further using historical control groups.
"This study has comprehensively re-evaluated patients after 16 years," said Professor George Ebers, lead investigator of the study, Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford. "The evidence for relapse rate reduction, combined with further support for long-term safety of Betaseron, is convincing. More studies are being done to further analyze the impact of treatment on disease progression."
The long-term use of Betaseron over 16 years revealed no new or unexpected adverse events. Betaseron was well accepted by patients in this long-term study. The median treatment duration with Betaseron of the analyzed trial participants was almost 10 years, while the longest duration on therapy is 17.1 years.
"The 16-year LTF is ground-breaking in that it is the longest follow-up study of patients on disease modifying MS therapy," said Dr. Ludger Heeck, Vice President and General Manager of the Therapeutics Business Unit at Berlex. "These results show that first-line and long-term use of Betaseron for relapsing MS patients is safe, effective and well-tolerated. These data are very reassuring given the chronic nature of relapsing forms of MS, and the need for long-term therapy."
Sixteen Years of Betaseron Use in Patients with MS
The 16-Year LTF Study provides clinical assessment of patients who first enrolled in the Betaseron pivotal trial between 1988 and 1990. Of the original 372 patients involved in the pivotal trial, 328 (88.2 percent) have been identified. It is a multicenter, open-label, observational study designed to evaluate the impact of Betaseron treatment on long-term outcomes in patients with relapsing forms of MS. The study constitutes the longest follow up for any disease-modifying therapy in MS.
The results support a previously reported trend, in that there was a lower number of deaths in patients that were initially treated with Betaseron 250 mcg during the pivotal trial. This trend needs to be further evaluated.
The Betaseron pivotal trial was the first large, randomized, placebo-controlled study of any therapy in MS. This groundbreaking study was conducted in North America and led to the approval of Betaseron, the first disease-modifying agent for MS, in 1993. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three study arms, Betaseron® 50 mcg , Betaseron 250 mcg or placebo, with a median duration of observation of 45 months. Analysis after two years demonstrated that significantly more patients receiving Betaseron were relapse-free, that those relapses that occurred were less frequent and that hospitalizations for MS were cut nearly in half. These results were confirmed at five years.
###
About Betaseron
Betaseron® is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis to reduce the frequency of clinical exacerbations. The most commonly reported adverse reactions are lymphopenia, injection site reaction, asthenia, flu-like symptom complex, headache and pain. Betaseron should be used with caution in patients with depression. Injection site necrosis has been reported in 5 percent of patients in controlled trials. Patients should be advised of the importance of rotating injection sites. Female patients should be warned about the potential risk to pregnancy. Cases of anaphylaxis have been reported rarely. Please see full Prescribing Information for more information.
About Berlex
Berlex is committed to addressing unmet medical needs through research and development in the areas of oncology, gastroenterology, women's health, diagnostics and neurology. Berlex also markets diagnostic imaging agents, innovative treatments in the areas of female health care and oncology, as well as specialized therapeutics for life-threatening and disabling diseases of the central nervous system and cardiovascular system. Berlex has business operations in New Jersey, California and Washington. For more information, please visit http://www.berlex.com/.
Contact: Sean McMahill
sean.mcmahill@ogilvypr.com
Ogilvy Public Relations
Visit our multiple sclerosis section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/40986.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/40986.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Betaseron - Was diet considered?
posted by J.T. Waldron on 9 Apr 2006 at 12:21 amTo examine a clear distinction between those on Betaseran and those off Betaseran, was diet considered as a factor? Did researchers explore the impact of diet on either group, or dimissed diet as having no impact?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



