Blood Tests May Be Better Than Standard Skin Test For Diagnosing Latent Tuberculosis

Main Category: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses
Also Included In: Blood / Hematology
Article Date: 24 Apr 2006 - 3:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (2 votes)

Healthcare Prof:4 stars

4 (1 votes)


Two blood tests for diagnosing latent tuberculosis (TB) infection can individually produce fewer false-positive results than the standard tuberculin skin test, according to a study in this week's issue of The Lancet.

Eradication of TB in low-prevalence countries is a realistic aim. Diagnosis and treatment of people with latent infection, who are a reservoir for future cases, will be key. However, the standard diagnostic test for latent TB--the century-old tuberculin skin test--is unreliable, often producing false negative results in high-risk groups and false positives in others, such as those who have received BCG vaccine. Two commercially available blood tests, T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold, might be more reliable.

In a prospective study, Luca Richeldi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy) and colleagues tested the effectiveness of all three tests in routine clinical practice in around 400 people. The performance of each blood test was compared with the skin test. They found that fewer BCG vaccinated individuals were identified as positive by either blood test than by the skin test.

Dr Richeldi states: "QuantiFERON-TB Gold and T-SPOT.TB show good diagnostic agreement with the skin test, but have higher specificity. As such either in combination with or as a substitute for the skin test, they could increase the diagnostic sensitivity of testing for latent TB infection."

The investigators also found that indeterminate and positive results differed between the two blood tests, especially in immunosuppressed patients and young children; these findings suggest that the new tests might produce different results in routine clinical practice. The authors state that the choice of diagnostic test to use should therefore depend on the population being tested, the purpose of testing, and the resources available.

###

Contact: Luca Richeldi, Policlinic University Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena (Italy).

Joe Santangelo
Lancet

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our infectious diseases / bacteria / viruses section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Joe Santangelo. "Blood Tests May Be Better Than Standard Skin Test For Diagnosing Latent Tuberculosis." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 24 Apr. 2006. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/42018.php>

APA
Joe Santangelo. (2006, April 24). "Blood Tests May Be Better Than Standard Skin Test For Diagnosing Latent Tuberculosis." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/42018.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Infectious Diseases News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »