Blood Tests May Be Better Than Standard Skin Test For Diagnosing Latent Tuberculosis
Main Category: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / VirusesAlso Included In: Blood / Hematology
Article Date: 24 Apr 2006 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
Two blood tests for diagnosing latent tuberculosis (TB) infection can individually produce fewer false-positive results than the standard tuberculin skin test, according to a study in this week's issue of The Lancet.
Eradication of TB in low-prevalence countries is a realistic aim. Diagnosis and treatment of people with latent infection, who are a reservoir for future cases, will be key. However, the standard diagnostic test for latent TB--the century-old tuberculin skin test--is unreliable, often producing false negative results in high-risk groups and false positives in others, such as those who have received BCG vaccine. Two commercially available blood tests, T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold, might be more reliable.
In a prospective study, Luca Richeldi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy) and colleagues tested the effectiveness of all three tests in routine clinical practice in around 400 people. The performance of each blood test was compared with the skin test. They found that fewer BCG vaccinated individuals were identified as positive by either blood test than by the skin test.
Dr Richeldi states: "QuantiFERON-TB Gold and T-SPOT.TB show good diagnostic agreement with the skin test, but have higher specificity. As such either in combination with or as a substitute for the skin test, they could increase the diagnostic sensitivity of testing for latent TB infection."
The investigators also found that indeterminate and positive results differed between the two blood tests, especially in immunosuppressed patients and young children; these findings suggest that the new tests might produce different results in routine clinical practice. The authors state that the choice of diagnostic test to use should therefore depend on the population being tested, the purpose of testing, and the resources available.
###
Contact: Luca Richeldi, Policlinic University Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena (Italy).
Joe Santangelo
Lancet
Visit our infectious diseases / bacteria / viruses section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/42018.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/42018.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




