HIV drugs and life expectancy
Main Category: HIV / AIDSArticle Date: 17 Oct 2003 - 0:00 PDT
'HIV drugs and life expectancy'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.64 (11 votes) |
| Article opinions: | 1 posts |
The vast majority of HIV patients taking the latest combination treatments survive at least a decade, say researchers.
Trials across several European countries found death rates from Aids have fallen by 80% since 1997, when the regime was introduced.
Older people infected with HIV no longer have a reduced life expectancy compared with the young.
However, experts say that some UK HIV cases are still not treated this way.
More than 50,000 people in the UK are living with HIV, and 'highly active antiretroviral therapy' (HAART) is the most advanced method of attacking the virus, even though it cannot cure the infection.
When the combination of drugs was first introduced, death rates immediately fell by half.
Initially, only one in five people were given HAART, but that has risen swiftly as the impact of the drugs became apparent.
However, it is only now that the effects of HAART on lifespan of HIV patients can be measured and assessed.
Compare and contrast
Scientists at the Medical Research Council's Clinical Trials Unit in London assessed the results of 22 different studies across Europe, Australia and Canada, and confirmed the effects of the introduction of HAART were the same everywhere.
The results were published in the Lancet medical journal.
Dr Kholoud Porter, who led the analysis, said: 'The introduction of HAART has been a tremendous success.
'Before this therapy was introduced, about half of those infected were expected to live for ten years after diagnosis, much less if they were, say, 40 years old when infected.
'Now, people treated with these combinations of drugs can almost all expect to live at least 10 years after diagnosis, regardless of their age at infection.
'However, our findings do point to the importance of an early diagnosis so that people can access the best treatments at the right time.
'We also need to continue to explore what happens when therapy starts to fail, for example due to resistance to antiretroviral drugs, if we are to maintain improved life expectancy for people living with HIV.'
Missing out
Julian Meldrum, from Aidsmap, told the BBC that there were some grounds to hope that the drugs would keep on working well into the second decade after diagnosis - although little evidence to confirm this is yet available.
However, he said: 'There are still some HIV patients in the UK who have unequal access to these treatments - mainly in the refugee and migrant communities.
'And the study shows that injecting drug users who are infected with HIV this way are still more likely to die than people infected through sexual contact.'
The success of HAART in the developed world increasingly highlights the gulf between these countries and those in the developing world, where access to any form of antiretroviral drugs is often almost impossible.
Last year, the number of people worldwide infected with HIV reached more than 40 million.
Visit our hiv / aids section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/4503.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/4503.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)
It is sad to say
posted by john F M on 16 Jul 2010 at 1:47 amIt is sad to see that the FDA has set against itself and the rest of the scientific researchers around the world . For years the USA has dominated the world of science, along with other aspects, Has set out to police . The FDA has in fact done more harm than good. But not that they will admit. So with all the red tape and the false agendas . We the people suffer and wait . But wait for what is the question . And there is no answer to that. We know today that we are on the brink of curing Aids and preventing all cancers that plague the people. And most of that is through natural medications. Or generic.
People sen to move away when they hear that word. Most see that word as meaning less than. We know that the drugs that are cooked up are more harmful to us. And as time goes on we discover that most of what the FDA has approved is not as good for us as the FDA claims . But it is money in there pockets. A company develops a medication and the FDA approves it . Years later the people discover that it is bad and sue the company and the doctors that administer it. But no one even takes a second look at the FDA. Even with something as simple as B15. A natural vitamin yet it is illegal . Yet even the FDA says it is a good thing they will not allow it to be put into the hands of the people. Why is that? Is the government to blame? NO! . It is the people that allow this to continue. And as we know from history. Any one that goes against the powers the be will loose everything . And eventually there life . So what is there to do but hurry up and wait .
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'HIV drugs and life expectancy'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





