IVF Is More Cost-effective Than Intra-uterine Insemination, Mathematical Model Predicts

Main Category: Fertility
Article Date: 25 Jun 2006 - 22:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:4 and a half stars

4.4 (5 votes)

Healthcare Prof:3 stars

3 (1 votes)


A theoretical study reveals that in-vitro fertilisation is less costly and more cost-effective than intra-uterine insemination, for the treatment of infertility in couples with unexplained infertility or mild male factor subfertility. In a study published today in the open access journal BMC Health Services Research, researchers use a mathematical model to show that offering a full cycle of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) is better value for money for couples and tax-payers than offering multiple cycles of intra-uterine insemination (IUI), followed by IVF if IUI fails. IUI is the treatment currently recommended by the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) for unexplained infertility and male factor subfertility. Although it is cheaper than IVF, IUI requires many more attempts and often fails to result in pregnancy, forcing couples to undergo an IVF cycle after many attempts at IUI.

Nora Pashayan from the Institute of Public Health in Cambridge, UK, collaborated with colleagues to build a mathematical model that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of IVF and that of IUI, followed by IVF if IUI fails. They evaluated the cost of treatment for 100 simulated couples with unexplained infertility and mild male factor subfertility.

Pashayan et al.'s results show that, as IVF is more efficient and more likely to result in pregnancy after the first trial, offering IVF first is more cost-effective than offering IUI alone, or than offering IUI followed by IVF if IUI fails. The amount of money saved if IVF were offered first instead of unstimulated IUI, the least expensive of IUI treatments, would amount to Ł174,200. This amount of money could pay for IVF treatments for an additional 54 couples.

###

Article:
Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility
Nora Pashayan, Georgios Lyratzopoulos and Raj Mathur
BMC Health Services Research 2006, in press

Contact: Juliette Savin

BioMed Central

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our fertility section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Juliette Savin. "IVF Is More Cost-effective Than Intra-uterine Insemination, Mathematical Model Predicts." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 25 Jun. 2006. Web.
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/45801.php>

APA
Juliette Savin. (2006, June 25). "IVF Is More Cost-effective Than Intra-uterine Insemination, Mathematical Model Predicts." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/45801.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Fertility

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Fertility News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Fertility Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »