Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Treatments Compared By Study
Main Category: Eczema / PsoriasisArticle Date: 19 Jul 2006 - 8:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Oral psoralen -UV-A therapy was found to be more effective than narrowband UV-B therapy in treating patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, according to an article in the July issue of Archives of Dermatology.
It is unclear whether narrowband UV-B (NB-UVB) therapy is as effective as psoralen-UV-A (PUVA) therapy in treating psoriasis, according to background information in the article. PUVA therapy includes the combination of 8-methoxypsoralen medication (taken orally) and exposure to UV-A (long-wave) radiation. NB-UVB involves exposure to UV-B (short-wave) radiation and is thought to be safer than PUVA.
Sami S. Yones, M.Sc., and colleagues from King's College London conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy of PUVA and NB-UVB therapies in treating chronic plaque psoriasis. Ninety-three patients with moderate-to-severe cases of the disease were recruited to participate in the study. Two hours before receiving UV treatment, patients in the NB-UVB group took a placebo and those in the PUVA group took 10-mg of 8-methoxypsoralen. Patients in both groups attended sessions twice weekly until their skin cleared, up to a maximum of 30 sessions. Patients whose skin cleared were followed up until relapse or for 12 months.
In patients with skin types I through IV (skin more likely to burn), PUVA was more effective than NB-UVB at clearing skin, with respective 84 percent vs. 65 percent clearance. Patients in the PUVA group also achieved skin clearance in a significantly shorter number of treatments, a median of 17 treatments, compared to 28.5 treatments in the NB-UVB group. Nearly half of patients in the PUVA group experienced erythema (redness of the skin) at some point during treatment, compared to less than one-quarter in the NB-UVB group. Six months after skin clearance was achieved, 68 percent of patients in the PUVA group were still clear compared to 35 percent of patients in the NB-UVB group. Overall, patients with skin types V and VI had a lower rate of clearance than those with skin types I through IV (24 percent vs. 75 percent).
The authors write that despite the disadvantages of PUVA treatment (i.e., may cause nausea, has the potential to cause skin cancer, cannot be used during pregnancy), their results "suggest that PUVA compared with NB-UVB tends to clear psoriasis more reliably, with fewer treatments and for longer and should, therefore, still be used in appropriate patients."
###
(Arch Dermatol. 2006; 142: 836 - 842.)
Contact: Sami S. Yones, M.Sc.
JAMA and Archives Journals
Visit our eczema / psoriasis section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/47539.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/47539.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





