Study Examines Cost-Effectiveness Of Using Prizes To Treat Stimulant Abusers
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsAlso Included In: Rehabilitation / Physical Therapy
Article Date: 07 Oct 2006 - 16:00 PDT
'Study Examines Cost-Effectiveness Of Using Prizes To Treat Stimulant Abusers'
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Stimulant abusers rewarded with prizes for submitting drug-free urine samples have longer periods of continuous abstinence-but cost more to treat-than those in traditional therapy, researchers at Yale School of Medicine report in the September issue of Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
Led by Todd A. Olmstead, associate research scientist in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at Yale School of Medicine (EPH), the research team analyzed a clinical trial, conducted within the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network, in which 415 stimulant abusers were randomly assigned to traditional therapy or traditional therapy plus prize-based incentives.
Compared to traditional therapy alone, the researchers found that using prize-based incentives to lengthen the duration of continuous abstinence by one week costs an additional $258 per patient.
"Many studies have already shown that prize-based incentives are very effective at improving drug use outcomes among a wide range of substance abusing populations," said Olmstead. "However, one of the reasons we haven't seen greater adoption of these tools in practice is that not much was known about their implementation costs."
"We did the study to shed light on the costs and cost-effectiveness of this potentially important tool. If policy makers believe that $258 is a good price to pay to extend the longest duration of continuous stimulant-abstinence by one week, then we should expect to see more clinics adopting these types of tools," Olmstead added. "The costs of prize-based incentives appear to be lower than those required to implement voucher-based incentive procedures."
###
Other authors on the NIDA-funded study include Jody L. Sindelar, professor of public health at EPH, and Nancy M. Petry, professor of psychiatry at the University of Connecticut Health Center and the designer of the prize-based incentive technique.
Citation: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Online Edition (September 12, 2006)
Yale News Releases are available via the World Wide Web at http://www.yale.edu/opa
For further information please go to:
Yale University
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/53347.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/53347.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Add Your Opinion On This Article
'Study Examines Cost-Effectiveness Of Using Prizes To Treat Stimulant Abusers'Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.








