Lymphotrophic Nanoparticle Enhanced MR Imaging For Detection Of Metastatic Disease

Main Category: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology;  MRI / PET / Ultrasound
Article Date: 09 Oct 2006 - 0:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'Lymphotrophic Nanoparticle Enhanced MR Imaging For Detection Of Metastatic Disease'

Patient / Public:3 stars

3 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


Detection of occult lymph node (LN) metastasis can alter treatment selection and patient outcome. An exciting new technique developed over the past decade is reviewed in the epub version of Abdominal Imaging with regard to technique and outcomes in prostate and bladder cancer.

Dr. Saokar and associates at the Massachusetts General Hospital report on lymphotrophic nanoparticle enhanced MR (LNMRI). The technique utilizes ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide particles coated with low molecular weight dextran. The nanoparticles range from 30-50nm and have a prolonged blood half-life. The particles cross the capillary walls following intravenous injection and are transported to LNs. This transport process takes 24-36 hours and MR imaging is then performed.

LNMRI indirectly evaluates macrophage function in the LN. Normal or benign nodes phagocytose the nanoparticles resulting in a drop in the MR signal intensity due to the effect of the iron oxide. These nodes appear dark on T2 weighted images. Malignant LNs are replaced with tumor cells and therefore have fewer or no macrophages and less iron oxide accumulation. These appear bright on T2 weighted images. The iron oxide particles are biodegraded, enter the plasma iron pool and incorporated into hemoglobin. Side effects from the iron oxide injection occur in 28% of patients, are usually mild and consist of headaches, uticaria, back pain and vasodilatation.

MR imaging is performed before and after particle injection, so that comparison can be made. Quantitative methods are now used to accurately assess degree of uptake and thus reduce variability of interpretation. False-positive results can occur due to granulomatous disease, infection, focal nodal necrosis or a prominent fatty LN hilum.

In a group of 30 patients with genitourinary malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 80%, respectively (Radiology 1998; 207:799-808). In a recent trial of prostate cancer patients, the detection of metastatic LN increased from 35% with MR alone to 91% using LNMRI (N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2491-2499). The specificity also increased from 90% to 98%. In 58 bladder cancer patients, a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 99% were reported (Radiology 2004; 203:449-456).

This technique is superior to traditional imaging for the detection of LN metastasis as it adds a functional component to LN size and shape to improve the diagnostic capabilities.

By Christopher P. Evans, M.D.

Abdom Imaging 2006 DOI 10.1007/s00261-006-9119-7 Link here.

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.

To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to:
www.urotoday.com

Copyright © 2006 - UroToday

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our radiology / nuclear medicine section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Unwin Jones. "Lymphotrophic Nanoparticle Enhanced MR Imaging For Detection Of Metastatic Disease." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 9 Oct. 2006. Web.
26 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/53589.php>

APA
Unwin Jones. (2006, October 9). "Lymphotrophic Nanoparticle Enhanced MR Imaging For Detection Of Metastatic Disease." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/53589.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Add Your Opinion On This Article

'Lymphotrophic Nanoparticle Enhanced MR Imaging For Detection Of Metastatic Disease'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


Radiology / Nuclear Medicine

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Radiology News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Radiology / Nuclear Medicine Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »