Florida Lawsuit Highlights Problems With Do No Resuscitate Orders
Main Category: Litigation / Medical MalpracticeAlso Included In: Seniors / Aging; Caregivers / Homecare
Article Date: 02 Jan 2007 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.6 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
USA Today on Tuesday profiled the case of Madeline Neumann, a Florida woman with Alzheimer's disease whose granddaughters filed a lawsuit against her nursing home and physician because they did not follow her do-not-resuscitate order. The lawsuit, filed in 1997 and likely to proceed to trial early next year, alleges that the Joseph Morse Geriatric Center in West Palm Beach, Fla., and Jaimy Bensimon, the chief physician at the facility, committed battery against Neumann when they failed to follow her DNR order after she collapsed. In addition, the lawsuit, which seeks unspecified damages, alleges breach of contract and negligence. Attorney James Nosich, who represents Bensimon, said that Bensimon decided to send Neumann to the hospital rather than follow her DNR order because he was not at the nursing home at the time she collapsed and sought to have her condition evaluated. According to USA Today, the lawsuit has received national attention and might have "significant implications for efforts to hold hospitals, nursing homes and physicians accountable if they disregard living wills and advance directives." Lois Sherperd, a law professor at Florida State University who specializes in health care law and end-of-life issues, said, "We've been lulled into this sense of security that all you need to do is have an advance directive. But it's not as simple as that. They're clumsy documents and vague. They can't predict all conditions." Nosich said, "At the end of the day, when the (emergency) phone call comes in, do you want your doctor, before letting you die, to have you evaluated? Or do you let a nonmedical professional give your doctor the information and have him rely on that?" Nosich added, "If you call 911, you get sued. If you don't call, you get sued" (Parker, USA Today, 12/19).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/59682.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/59682.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Opinion On DNR Orders
posted by Dianne Parker on 4 Jan 2007 at 9:50 amAs the spouse of a disabled & injured patient - I can understand some of the frustration these girls have about the treatment of their grandmother! My own husband (and myself) have been ignored when medical decisions (even a couple of surgeries) have been made by the surgeons in charge.
Now we have to live with the results - no one but the patients and their families suffer; the hospitals get paid regardless; the doctors get paid regardless or whether they perform their procedureds correctly or in-correctly; the patient(s) and their families pay for life; because of the need for much more aggressive medical needs and care as well as medication to keep them going. The doctors and hospitals sit back getting richer and richer - WE THE TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING THE BILLS FOR THEM TO DO SO.
Make it clear and enforceable
posted by Karel Rei on 25 Oct 2010 at 9:23 amWhatever is done - the issue needs to be made clear and legally clear - so that individual doctors are not allowed to make such decisions against the wishes of patients in surgery.
Perhaps there is some definable difference between trivial and desirable resuscitation and resuscitation as a result of serious conditions in surgery and anaesthesia that could be applied -- this said from a patient's point of view.
Something needs to be done. I am going into surgery in 2 weeks - and the surgeon has said the DNR will NOT be honored.
What is it worth? What have we fought for.
Can we accomplish nothing in politics and law?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




