Indiana House Rejects Cigarette Tax Increase To Fund Health Care Coverage
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingAlso Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 06 Mar 2007 - 23:00 PDT
The Indiana House on Tuesday voted 52-44 against a bill (HB 1008) that would have raised the state's cigarette tax by 25 cents per pack to fund health coverage for low-income, uninsured residents, the Evansville Courier & Press reports. The tax was expected to generate an estimated $130 million annually. Combined with federal matching funds and participant costs, the tax increase would have generated an estimated $480 million annually. The funds would have been used to provide health coverage for about 120,000 state residents in families with annual incomes of less than 200% of the federal poverty level. Jane Jankowski, Gov. Mitch Daniels' (R) press secretary, said Daniels, who supported the tax increase, was "surprised and disappointed in the outcome but is hopeful there is still a way to move forward effectively to reduce Indiana's smoking rate, immunize more children and expand health care coverage for working" Indiana residents (Evansville Courier & Press, 2/28).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/64424.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/64424.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Smoking vs. epilepsy
posted by Jim Schellenberger on 29 Jun 2010 at 5:28 pmRegarding a 25cent cigarette tax increase, I don't understand why cigarettes aren't taxed so high that they're priced out of the market, if they can't legally be banned outright.
When things are found to cause cancer or other serious conditions, they are outlawed or regulated--lead, asbestos, PCBs, DDT, radon, etc. Smoking causes cancer and emphysema.
Universal access to health insurance should be ensured, but not equal costs and benefits.
Health insurance needs to be like every other insurance, you pay relative to your risks and you elect what coverage you want. If you smoke, drink, daily eat fast food and don't exercise, then you can elect french fry coverage and pay higher premiums. I don't want to pay for Billy Marlboro's oxygen tank he drags around for the last 20 years of his life.
A sky diver and a priest don't pay the same life insurance.
There are a lot of medical conditions and issues, and health insurance is needed like other insurances--to manage risk and costs. I have epilepsy, I didn't choose it. I know several people with autistic and special needs kids. Compare this to all the people who choose to be unhealthy and raise costs for everyone else (and pay the same). They don't care about their health, I don't either.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






