Migratory Birds: Innocent Scapegoats For The Dispersal Of The H5N1 Virus
Main Category: Bird Flu / Avian FluAlso Included In: Veterinary
Article Date: 02 Apr 2007 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A review to be published shortly in the British Ornithologists' Union's journal, Ibis, critically examines the arguments concerning the role of migratory birds in the global dispersal of the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1. Ecologists of the Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat and of the GEMI-CNRS in the Camargue (France), Michel Gauthier-Clerc, Camille Lebarbenchon and Frédéric Thomas conclude that human commercial activities, particularly those associated with poultry, are the major factors that have determined its global dispersal.
Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1 was first detected in poultry in November 1996 in south-east China. The virus subsequently dispersed throughout most of Asia, and also to Africa and Europe. From mid-2005, migratory wild birds have been widely considered to be the primary source of the dispersal of H5N1 outside Asia. This claim was based on the discovery in May 2005 that hundreds of wild birds had died on Lake Quinghaihu, on the high Asian plateau in China. It is however clear that the trajectory of the virus does not correspond with to the main migration routes of wild birds. The global network of migration routes seemed to hide the globalisation - without strict health control - of the exchanges of poultry, the more likely mechanism for disease spread.
During the previous epizooties of highly pathogenic subtypes of H5 and H7, it was shown that the expansion of these viruses was due to human activities, in particular, movements of poultry or their products. This commercial scenario is the one that explained the expansion and the maintenance of the H5N1 virus in south-east Asia until 2004, via the legal and illegal trade in poultry.
The cases in western Europe in February 2006 after a cold spell on the Black Sea showed that virus can spread through infected wild birds travelling short distances, but no evidence for long distance transmission during seasonal migration has yet been found. The evidence overwhelmingly supports the hypothesis that human movements of domestic poultry have been the main agent of global dispersal of the virus to date. The occurrence of an outbreak at a commercial turkey farm in Suffolk, England, in February 2007 fits this wider pattern.
Wild birds, particularly waterfowl, are a key element of the viral ecology of low pathogenic avian influenza. Very high densities of domestic animals and increased stress factors are particularly favourable for the maintenance and transmission of virulent agents, in particular subtypes of highly pathogenic influenza. Paradoxically, the H5N1 virus coupled with a fear of transmission by wild birds could lead to a reversion to battery farming which increases risk of outbreaks. This would stall the current trend to better animal welfare resulting from free-range agriculture. Maintaining these trends, whilst controlling disease through strong veterinary scrutiny and control of trade, is more likely to be a successful strategy.
###
Contact: Davina Quarterman
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Visit our bird flu / avian flu section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/66254.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/66254.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Migratory Birds Definitely Spread H5N1
posted by Brad Arnold on 2 Apr 2007 at 2:01 amTo embrace the argument that migratory birds are innocent scapegoats for the dispersal of H5N1, you would need to believe that:
1. Migratory birds aren't infected by, can't fly with, or can't spread H5N1.
2. Every similar strain of H5N1 found in different locations has trade as an alternate explaination.
Instead, not only are migratory birds proven to be infected by, can fly with, and can spread H5N1, there are numerous instances that can only be explained by migratory birds spreading it.
Obviously, migratory birds cross-pollinate different strains of H5N1 far and wide. This can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt using genetic forensics (i.e. finding exotic genetic sequences in widely different locations unexplainable by trade).
The rapid population increase of farm animals and people, increased rapid intercontinental travel and trade, and migratory birds cross-pollinating different strains, combine to form a viral evolutionary accellerating dynamic. Since lowing the human or farm animal population, or limiting rapid intercontinental travel and trade is out of the question, then there are only two options:
1. Cull the migratory birds that are cross-pollinating different strains of H5N1.
or
2. Tolerate more rapid H5N1 evolution, which will likely result in more flu pandemics.
I predict option #2 will be chosen by default, but when a severe flu pandemic causes massive pain and disruption, great regret and grief will be felt for not choosing option #1.
Besides, those migratory birds are doomed soon due to global warming anyway.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



