Male Circumcision And HIV Prevention, Munich, Germany 2nd April 2007
Main Category: HIV / AIDSAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Men's health; Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 02 Apr 2007 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
1.8 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Male circumcision (MC) markedly decreases the acquisition of HIV infection, the major epidemic of our time. This is the first biological intervention shown to prevent HIV infection and will not depend upon continuing behaviour change to give protection. In 1986, five years after the description of AIDS, the first article suggesting that male circumcision is associated with lower risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was published. During the following 15 years, different studies - almost exclusively from sub-Saharan Africa, which quickly became the centre of HIV epidemic - increasingly supported this hypothesis. For example, tribes and other defined populations with low prevalence of MC had high prevalence of HIV infection, suggesting a correlation between MC and HIV prevention.
Despite that, there was still uncertainty among many scientists and public health scientific societies, mainly due to the fear that circumcised men have different (safer) sexual practices than men who are not, and that this and not male circumcision led to lower rates of HIV infection in circumcised men and in populations where circumcision is common. To eliminate this concern, three specifically designed trials were carried out.
In 2005, the results of the first trial showed a 60% protective effect against HIV infection among the men who were circumcised (Bertran Auvert and colleagues, PLoS Med. 2005;2:e209). The study has been conducted on the behalf of the South African National Institute for Communicable Diseases (Johannesburg) and the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (ANRS Paris, France), involving 3,274 men who were randomized to receive circumcision or not. The subjects were followed over a mean period of 18.1 months, and the trial was stopped prematurely because of the high efficacy observed among circumcised patients.
In February 2007, the second and third studies found a protective effect of 53% and 51% respectively in men who were circumcised, compared to those who were not (Robert Bailey and colleagues, Lancet 2007; 369:643-56 - Ronald Gray and colleagues, Lancet. 2007; 369:657-66). The second trial enrolled 2,784 men and was carried out on the behalf of the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institute for Health Research, while the third study, also sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, randomised 4,996 men. Each of these trials was also stopped prematurely on 12 December 2006, due to an extremely high efficacy rate. The findings of the studies are similar, and remarkably consistent with the protective effect (58% on average) found in a systematic review of observational studies available in medical literature.
"Current data show that circumcision of adult men results in an approximately 60% reduction in acquisition of HIV infection", said Dr. George Schmid (Dept. of HIV / AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland).
About 30% of men are estimated to be circumcised worldwide, although this rate is still less than 20% in Europe. In European countries, MC is uncommon, but also the prevalence of HIV is lower than Africa. Therefore, encouraging male circumcision in Europe is unlikely to be a reasonable measure for HIV prevention purposes. However, different studies show the existence of additional benefits provided by MC, such as the reduction of urinary tract infections in infants and prevention of penile cancer. Circumcision in the neonatal period has beneficial effects other than HIV prevention.
Is male circumcision a reasonable mean of HIV prevention in the developing world?
Surprising to some, multiple studies have consistently shown that populations which do not traditionally circumcise their children or young adults will readily accept MC. In 13 studies carried out in sub-Saharan Africa, 65% of men were willing to be circumcised and 69% of women favoured MC for their male partners. Improved hygiene, sexual satisfaction, and partial protection from HIV are cited as principal reasons. The widespread implementation of MC in Southern sub-Saharan Africa, where prevalence of MC is generally low and HIV is very common, could prevent 2,000,000 infections over a 10-year period. While it is unclear if a circumcised man who is HIV-positive is less likely to transmit HIV to a woman than if he is not circumcised, women in general would benefit from increasing rates of male circumcision because fewer men would become infected with HIV. Male circumcision is also a cost-effective intervention, quite competitive in cost with other proven means of preventing HIV infection.
Male circumcision does not offer a complete protection against HIV infection. Other behavioural prevention measures must be maintained. Men may adopt risky sexual behaviours following circumcision, believing that they are protected against acquiring HIV infection ("risk compensation" phenomenon). Men opting for MC procedure and their partners should be carefully counseled on the need to adopt other HIV preventive measures. Counseling is necessary to prevent circumcised men developing a false sense of protection and engaging in high risk behaviors that could reverse the partial protection provided by circumcision. "This is perhaps the biggest risk related to the promotion of MC as an HIV preventive method", pointed out Prof. Schmid.
WHO recommends that countries - where the incidence of heterosexually acquired HIV infection is high and the diffusion of male circumcision is low - urgently consider implementing the access to male circumcision services as a priority. WHO examined all the available data about the effectiveness of male circumcision in preventing HIV infection, and recognized MC as an additional important intervention to reduce the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men. "Adequate resources should be rapidly mobilized to support the expansion of safe male circumcision services within the context of moving towards universal access to comprehensive HIV prevention, treatment and care", concluded Prof. Schmid.
17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
and 25th International Congress of Chemotherapy
Munich/Germany, 31 March - 3 April 2007
www.eccmid-icc.org
Visit our hiv / aids section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/66865.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/66865.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Circumcision Is Ill-Advised
posted by Petrina Fadel on 2 Apr 2007 at 4:14 pmRecent studies claim that circumcision helps prevent HIV. A new Dutch study in March casts serious doubt on the wisdom of WHO and
UNAIDS officials promoting male circumcision to prevent HIV infection,
not only because of the risk of increasing HIV in women, but also because
circumcision removes a natural HIV-1 barrier from men.
"Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells"
(Nature Medicine- 4 March 2007). This study states, "Langerhans cells
(LCs) specifically express Langerin . . . LCs reside in the epidermis of
the skin and in most mucosal epithelia, such as the ectocervix, vagina
and foreskin . . . " Removal of the foreskin (male circumcision) removes
the langerhans cells that express langerin, the natural barrier to HIV-1
transmission.
To learn more about this study, see:
http://www.africasciencenews.org/_disc1/00000036.htm
In addition, a recent study in the March, 2007 issue of the "Annals of
Epidemiology" found that circumcision is "likely to spread" HIV. See:
http://www.afrol.com/articles/24469
A new penile touch test sensitivity study published in the April 2007 BJU
International found that circumcised men are significantly less sensitive
to fine touch than are non-circumcised men. Circumcised men might be less
likely to use condoms because of reduced penile sensitivity. See:
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/pdf/sorrells_2007.pdf
Another preliminary study in Malawi suggests that the incidence of HIV is
highest where male circumcision is highest.
A promising development in the battle against HIV/AIDS is the
news this past week from Emory University, where an AIDS vaccine
to prevent HIV is nearing reality. See:
http://www.11alive.com/news/article_news.aspx?storyid=93439
Below you will find several articles that shed light on the
circumcision/HIV issue. If circumcision truly helped prevent HIV, then
circumcised men would not need to worry about other methods of HIV
prevention. The false sense of security that circumcision provides could
increase the incidence of HIV.
It is ill advised for circumcision to be championed for large numbers of
men in Africa when 98.15% of the men in the African studies' control
group who were not circumcised did NOT contract HIV after 24
months. Circumcision did nothing to protect the 22 men who acquired HIV
in the Rakai, Uganda study. One has to question if incidences of condom
failures were factored into the African study findings- condoms that
broke, slipped off, or leaked over the rim and which could have been the
cause of HIV acquisition. In 1993 the University of Texas analyzed 11
different studies that tracked the effectiveness of condoms to prevent
transmission of the AIDs virus. The average condom failure rate in the
11 studies for preventing transmission of the AIDS virus was 31%.
("Social Science and Medicine", Vol. 36, 1993.)
An intact (not circumcised) male who does not engage in risky sexual
behavior is far less likely to acquire HIV/AIDS than a circumcised male
who engages in risky sexual behavior. Behavior is the key component in
preventing HIV, not circumcision.
The United States has a long history and experience with circumcising
millions of men in the past century under hygienic medical conditions.
This has NOT prevented circumcised males from acquiring HIV.
Instead, the United States has one of the highest rates of HIV in the
developed world, despite the fact that male circumcision in the U.S. has
been widespread here. This is in contrast to Europe and other locations
around the world where male circumcision is less common and HIV rates are relatively low.
Since the 1800s, medical "luminaries" have promoted circumcision to prevent a variety of diseases/problems. Those promoting circumcision to prevent HIV are following the historical trend to promote circumcision as a prevention/cure for the disease of the day. Now HIV can be added to the list of diseases circumcision purportedly prevents - masturbation, epilepsy, spinal paralysis, curvature of the spine, clubfoot, rectal prolapse, malnutrition, cancer, eye problems, UTIs, tuberculosis, HIV.
Sincerely,
Petrina Fadel, Director
Catholics Against Circumcision
http://www.catholicsagainstcircumcision.org/
New York
"HIV infection and circumcision: cutting through the hyperbole"
THE JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF
HEALTH, Volume 125, Number 6: Pages 259-265, November 2005
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/vanhowe2005a/
"Prevalence of complications of male circumcision in Anglophone Africa: a
systematic review"Adamson S Muula , Hans W Prozesky , Ronald H
Mataya and Joseph I Ikechebelu
BMC Urology 2007, 7:4 doi:10.1186/1471-2490-7-4
Published 2 March 2007
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/7/4
The Use of Male Circumcision to Prevent HIV Infection
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/HIVStatement.html
Why Most Published Research Findings are False - John Ioannidis
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1182327
Published online 2005 August 30
Why Is HIV So Prevalent In Africa? - Michael Fumento
http://www.fumento.com/disease/aids2005.html
Position Statement on the Use of Male Circumcision to Limit
HIV Infection
http://www.nocirc.org/statements/hiv2003.php
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




