No Prosecution At Bernard Matthews Cutting Plant, UK

Main Category: Nutrition / Diet
Also Included In: Bird Flu / Avian Flu;  Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 08 Apr 2007 - 0:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

A Food Standards Agency investigation has thoroughly examined the possibility that food waste at the Bernard Matthews cutting plant at Holton may have been stored inappropriately.

The investigation concluded there was no evidence of any offences under the Animal By-Products Regulations 2005, for which Defra is the enforcement authority. The Agency also considered whether there was sufficient evidence to justify a prosecution under the Animal By-Products (Identification) Regulations 1995 or the Food Hygiene (England) Regulations 2006, in relation to which the FSA is the enforcement authority.

In deciding whether or not to instigate a prosecution, the Agency applies the Code for Crown Prosecutors, which says that no prosecution may go ahead unless the prosecutor finds there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.

We have carefully scrutinised and considered the evidence in this case and concluded there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction. Accordingly, we have decided not to proceed to a prosecution in this case.

Food Standards Agency (UK)

• Additional
• References
• Citations