Rushing Mandatory HPV Vaccinations A 'Mistake,' Opinion Piece Says
Main Category: Cervical Cancer / HPV VaccineAlso Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health; Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 13 Apr 2007 - 15:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
Although much of the "resistance" to state efforts to mandate vaccination against human papillomavirus is "misguided," mandating the vaccine would be a "mistake at the present time," Arthur Allen -- a Washington, D.C.-based writer and author of the book "Vaccine: The Controversial Story of Medicine's Greatest Lifesaver" -- writes in Washington Post opinion piece (Allen, Washington Post, 4/8). Merck's HPV vaccine Gardasil in clinical trials has been shown to be 100% effective in preventing infection with strains 16 and 18, which together cause about 70% of cervical cancer cases, and about 99% effective in preventing HPV strains 6 and 11, which together with strains 16 and 18 cause about 90% of genital wart cases, among women not already infected with these strains. FDA in July 2006 approved Gardasil for sale and marketing to girls and women ages nine to 26, and CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices later that month voted unanimously to recommend that girls ages 11 and 12 receive the vaccine (Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 4/5). According to Allen, "the fact that HPV is sexually transmitted is no reason to keep children from being vaccinated against it." Allen writes that a "controversial" decision in 1992 to vaccinate infants and adolescents against hepatitis B "has clearly shown that public health campaigns can prevent disease without causing moral turpitude," adding that HPV "is not linked to risky sexual behavior" and is "as common as influenza." In addition, "as long as the HPV vaccine is not required, the people who need it most probably won't get it." However, Allen writes that he has "reservations" about mandating HPV vaccination because of cost concerns, the vaccine's lack of a "track record" and its current lack of "credibility." According to Allen, only Merck and "a few" advocates are calling for mandates. The "rickety" pediatric vaccination system is a "three-legged stool whose stability relies on the participation" of drug companies, the government and parents, according to Allen. "In failing to include two legs of the system, those pushing for immediate mandatory vaccination are risking it's collapse," Allen writes, concluding, "The HPV vaccine may do great things, but we shouldn't rush it" (Washington Post, 4/8).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our cervical cancer / hpv vaccine section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/67613.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/67613.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



