African-American And Hispanic Patients Receive Less Palliative And Lifesaving Treatment
Main Category: Palliative Care / Hospice CareAlso Included In: Public Health; Transplants / Organ Donations; Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP
Article Date: 05 May 2007 - 5:00 PDT
African-American and Hispanic patients hospitalized for complications of portal hypertension were less likely to undergo a palliative shunt, prompt endoscopy, or liver transplantation compared to white patients, according to a new study in the May issue of Hepatology, a journal published by John Wiley & Sons on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). The article is also available online via Wiley Interscience (http://www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/hepatology).
Liver disease is very common in the United States and as it progresses, patients develop portal hypertension-related complications, such as variceal bleeding, ascites or hepatic encephalopathy. These patients should be considered for liver transplantation, without which they face a 2-year survival prognosis of less than 50 percent. While awaiting transplants, they may be candidates for palliative procedures including endoscopic band ligation or portosystemic shunts.
Previous studies have revealed widespread racial disparities in disease treatments and outcomes. To determine the influence of race and health insurance for patients with serious liver disease, including their likelihood of receiving palliative procedures or transplants, researchers, led by Paul J. Thuluvath. MD (and Geoffrey Nguyen, Fellow in Gastroenterology & Hepatology) of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine examined a nationally representative, population-based sample of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension.
Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the researchers included 63,696 patients with cirrhosis who were admitted to a hospital between 1998 and 2003 for a complication of portal hypertension. The researchers gathered demographic data, information on health insurance and treatment efforts, and then performed statistical analyses, adjusting for potential confounding factors. They found that during hospital stays, African-American and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely than white patients to receive a portosystemic shunt, a prompt endoscopic variceal hemostasis, or a liver transplant.
Compared to white patients, the odds ratio of undergoing portosystemic shunt for was .37 for African-Americans, and .69 for Hispanics. Similarly, the odds ratio of undergoing liver transplantation was .32 for African-Americans and .46 for Hispanics. For patients with variceal bleeding, rates of upper endoscopy and variceal treatment were similar, however, the odds ratio of delayed endoscopy (more than 24 hours after admission) was 1.6 for African-American patients, compared to white patients. African-American patients were more likely to die in the hospital compared to white patients, while Hispanic patients were less likely than white patients to die in the hospital.
Relative to those who had private insurance, patients receiving Medicare, Medicaid or who were uninsured were less likely to undergo a shunt procedure, more likely to have a delayed endoscopy, and much less likely to receive a liver transplant.
"We have shown that there are striking racial variations in surgical and endoscopic procedures used in the inpatient management of complications of portal hypertension in the USA," the authors report. "The reasons for these racial differences are unclear from this study."
While non-medical factors such as health care access may play a contributing role, the authors also found that racial differences were independent of type of health insurance. They suggest that disease severity, for which they were unable to control, might also play a role.
"Further primary studies are warranted to confirm and elucidate the mechanisms of racial disparities in order to enact interventions to rectify them," the authors conclude. "Concurrently, it is a measure of good practice and quality of care to develop more standardized protocols in the management of portal hypertension to ensure equitable care regardless of race, health insurance coverage, or socioeconomic status."
###
Article: "Racial Disparities in the Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis and Complications of Portal Hypertension: A National Study" Nguyen, Geoffrey; Segev, Dorry; Thuluvath, Paul. Hepatology; May 2007; (DOI: 10.1002/hep.21580).
Contact: Amy Molnar
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Visit our palliative care / hospice care section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/69551.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/69551.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (15)
Flawed Science
posted by Raul Ramos y Sanchez on 6 May 2007 at 6:37 amRE: African-American And Hispanic Patients Receive Less Palliative And Lifesaving Treatment.
While undoubtedly well meaning, this article is scientifically flawed. It is based on the assumption that “Hispanic” is a racial category. Please check with the only “official” definition of Hispanic, that of the U.S. Census Bureau. (http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispdef.html) The Census Bureau clearly states that “persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race.” This article categorizes patients as either African-American, Hispanic or White, creating the assumption that a Hispanic could be neither Caucasian or Negroid. This is dangerously wrong.
While the concept of race is primarily a social construct, there is solid evidence of medical proclivities among members of genetically similar groups. Sickle cell anemia and certain types of skin cancers are two prominent examples. However, people labeled Hispanic are not a single race. The genetic variation of people named Garcia can be as diverse as that of those named Johnson.
The authors of this article, along with similar studies that use Hispanic as a racial category, should be challenged for using poor scientific methods.
The Semantics Of the word Hispanic in Europe and the USA
posted by Dr. Carlos Balboa on 6 May 2007 at 9:36 amI have worked as a doctor in the USA, Spain and the UK. From what I can gather, the word Hispanic has two meanings (I suggest not bothering looking things up in books and census, they need updating - the semantics of words are always changing, especially in English).
Hispanic (European Meaning) - A person from a country where SPanish is spoken as the mother tongue. The word is geographical and does not refer to race.
Hispanic (USA meaning) - Amerindians and Mestizos (mixed race of Amerindian and non-Amerindian) of Latin America.
I am 100% sure Hispanic has no other meaning in the USA. I have asked several people whether they would class a white Spaniard as a Hispanic, and every single one has said no.
Therefore, I suggest that when reading US studies, one bears this in mind when seeing the word Hispanic.
Follow Up To Dr. Balboa
posted by Raul Ramos y Sanchez on 8 May 2007 at 5:44 amThank you, Dr. Balboa, for your thorough rebuttal to my challenge of the scientific premise of the original article. [African-American And Hispanic Patients Receive Less Palliative And Lifesaving Treatment.]
Your carefully conducted sampling (" I have asked several people") and your sage advice to ignore any factual information ("I suggest not bothering looking things up in books and census") clearly refutes my challenge to the scientific veracity of this study.
If this is the level of scientific rigor we can expect from medical practitioners, the public should be warned.
Sincerely,
Raul Ramos y Sanchez
If this is the level of scientific rigor we can expect from medical practioners, the public should be warned.
Sincerely,
Raul Ramos y Sanchez
I Agree With Dr. Balboa
posted by Enrique Salbatini on 8 May 2007 at 7:00 amI have taught Spanish in the UK and the USA and agree totally with Dr. Balboa. One can read in books till blue in the face. But I go by what I hear and see in each continent, and he is right.
Dr. Balboa Has A Point
posted by Maria Cossio on 8 May 2007 at 7:02 amMost of my Mexican friends who live in the UK would agree with Dr. Balboa, while most of my Mexican American friends would not. As far as I am concerned, just this fact makes me think Dr. Balboa is right.
My Experience
posted by Pablo Herrero on 8 May 2007 at 7:09 amI was at secondary school in Australia and Texas. I am Peruvian. In Australia I was Peruvian, in Texas I was 'Hispanic'. I am half Peruvian Indian. I agree with Dr. Balboa. In the USA Hispanic refers to a Latin American who looks indigenous. In other parts of the world, Hispanic means from a Spanish-speaking country.
I too go by what I have seen and heard with my own eyes and ears, rather than taking the academic route and burying myself in census and documents. There is too much of that - perusing over papers, rather than looking at the world as it really is.
If an American sees a blonde blue-eyed Spaniard, he would not call him a Hispanic, an Australian would. I rest my case.
Confused By Facts?
posted by Raul Ramos y Sanchez on 8 May 2007 at 7:46 amTo those who agree with Dr. Balboa,
I hope your eccentric classification of "Hispanic" is clearly posted in all medical schools, hospitals, and medical offices. Otherwise the day will come (if it has not happened already) when someone labeled “Hispanic” is misdiagnosed.
Are you certain that your judgment about a person’s race is shared by every doctor, nurse, and medical researcher in the United States? While you personally may feel qualified to make a judgment about a person’s race, most Americans have been led to believe that anyone with a Spanish surname is “Hispanic.” Every year, our medical and nursing schools are graduating professionals who have been trained using articles and studies that classify Hispanic as racial group.
The evidence you offer is anecdotal. I am dealing in facts as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. I believe it is dangerously irresponsible to suggest we ignore facts and use some fuzzy, personal definition of a group that the majority of the American public (and likely most medical practitioners) considers a racial category.
Raul Ramos y Sanchez
Rubbish
posted by Barbara Chavez on 8 May 2007 at 8:55 amThe US Census Bureau bears no resemblance to what really happens in America. I agree with Dr. Balboa and the others - in the USA the term 'Hispanic' is a purely racial one, not cultural or geographical.
I am from Spain, and Hispanic in my country means from a Spanish speaking country. I worked as a nurse in California and can assure you I only ever heard the term Hispanic used there when referring to Amerindians south of the border. The term may be wrong, the census may contradict US usage of that term - but as far as I am concerned, that is all I heard over there.
I see the insistence on sticking to the Census term akin to Don Quixote fighting windmills. Americans will never stick to the proper meaning.
Hispanic Is A Racial Term In The USA
posted by David Ospi on 8 May 2007 at 9:01 amAsk an American policeman or border control guard what the term Hispanic means. The answer is pretty clear - he/she will give you a description about height, skin color, hair color - you will hear nothing about what language he/she speaks, etc. In America, Hispanic refers to a person's race - accept it. Because that is the way it is. I am Guatemalan and live in England, I have only ever heard the term applied to race in the USA - and have NEVER heard it used any other way in that country.
Thank You, Ms. Chavez
posted by Raul Ramos y Sanchez on 8 May 2007 at 9:20 amMs. Chavez,
You prove my point exactly. If the term “Hispanic” is a euphemism for “Amerindians south of the border,” why not used this more precise racial term in a medical study?
There is no place in medical studies for semantic imprecision. The authors of the study should say what they mean or find another term. To do otherwise is misleading.
Your argument merely underscores my original complaint. A study that uses “Hispanic” as a racial group is scientifically flawed.
Raul Ramos y Sanchez
First 10 opinions shown. For all opinions, click through to the full thread.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



