PET-CT Detects Muscular Lymphoma Better Than CT
Main Category: MRI / PET / UltrasoundAlso Included In: Lymphoma / Leukemia / Myeloma; Conferences
Article Date: 06 May 2007 - 16:00 PDT
|
|
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
PET-CT is better for early detection of muscular lymphoma than CT alone, according to a new study conducted by radiologists at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.
For the study, PET-CT was used to image 305 patients with lymphoma. Twelve of these patients had muscular involvement in which 10 were biopsy proven and two were proven by imaging follow-up.
According to the study, six of these patients had predominantly muscular lymphoma with or without bone involvement and three had nodal lymphoma and developed muscular involvement on subsequent imaging. Two of the 12 patients had liver metastases and one patient had an extensive malignancy that involved the face and underlying structures. In one case, a lymph node that was persistently enlarged on CT remained negative on all PET studies.
"Our results demonstrate that radiologists should remember that lymphoma can involve muscles, though many radiologists are less diligent in their analysis of musculature in lymphoma cases," said Saravanan Krishnamoorthy, MD, lead author of the study. "Also, the PET abnormalities often precede the CT changes, suggesting that muscle involvement by lymphoma may be an important part of staging that is neglected if only CT is performed," said Dr. Krishnamoorthy.
"This study shows that PET-CT is excellent in identifying lymphoma, both in lymph nodes and in extranodal sites. Therefore, staging will be both more accurate and precise; likewise, response to treatment will be both more accurate and precise," said Dr. Krishnamoorthy.
The full results of this study will be presented on Tuesday, May 8, 2007 during the American Roentgen Ray Society's annual meeting in Orlando, FL.
###
Contact: Necoya Lightsey
American Roentgen Ray Society
Visit our mri / pet / ultrasound section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/70036.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/70036.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



