Adjuvant Weekly Docetaxel For Patients With High Risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Pilot Study
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Men's health; Urology / Nephrology; Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 14 May 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
UroToday.com- Docetaxel chemotherapy is shown to improve survival in patients with androgen-insensitive prostate cancer (CaP). In the May, 2007 issue of the Journal of Urology, Dr. Adam Kibel and collaborators report a pilot study on adjuvant docetaxel in post radical prostatectomy (RP) CaP patients at high-risk for disease progression.
A total of 77 patients were prospectively enrolled between 2002 and 2004. Surgical pathology was centrally reviewed and patient risk for recurrence was at least 50% at 3 years based upon a validated model. Post-RP, patients could have a detectable PSA, but no radiographic evidence of distant disease. These patients then received 6 cycles of docetaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle.
Median follow-up was 29.2 months and only 1.3% had pT2Nx disease, although 74% were clinically staged as cT1-2. Pathologically, 99% had non-organ confined disease, 56% had Gleason score 8-10, 65% had positive surgical margins, 65% had seminal vesicle involvement and 38% had lymph node involvement.
Docetaxel therapy resulted in Grade I/II in 70%, Grade III in 26%, and Grade IV in 4%. By the end of 2005, 7 of 76 men (9%) had died with 4 deaths due to CaP. Disease progression at 29 months occurred in 61%. One and two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 63% and 42%, respectively. Median PFS was 16 months, while predicted PFS was 10 months. Patients who had an undetectable PSA at the initiation of docetaxel had lower evidence of progression.
The outcome of this cohort of CaP patients is heavily influenced by their very high-risk features and not getting the now documented docetaxel regimen every 3 weeks. Further randomized trials will continue to provide insight into this treatment paradigm.
Kibel AS, Rosenbaum E, Kattan MW, Picus J, Dreicer R, Klein EA, Chatta GS, Nelson JB, DiPaola RS, Roth BJ, Cookson MS, Wilding G, Jarrard DF, Beer TM, Ryan CW, Petrylak DP, Benson MC, Partin AW, Garrett-Mayer E, Eisenberger MA
J Urol 2007; 177(5):1777-81 Reviewed by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2006 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/70817.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/70817.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




