Court Case Over Frozen Embryos In Texas Could Have Implications For Roe V. Wade, Los Angeles Times Reports
Main Category: Litigation / Medical MalpracticeAlso Included In: Fertility; Abortion
Article Date: 01 Jun 2007 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
A case before the Texas Supreme Court over what should happen with three frozen embryos could have implications for Roe v. Wade -- the 1973 Supreme Court case that effectively barred state abortion bans -- the Los Angeles Times reports. The embryos were created by a Texas couple who divorced before the woman underwent in vitro fertilization. According to the Times, several hours before Augusta Roman was scheduled to undergo IVF, her husband at the time, Randy Roman, insisted that the procedure be canceled and that the embryos be frozen. The couple later began divorce proceedings. In the case, Augusta Roman is seeking to have the three embryos that survived the freezing process implanted, and Randy Roman is seeking to have them destroyed or to remain frozen indefinitely.
According to the Times, state courts have decided embryo cases on an individual basis because there is no federal precedent. The supreme courts of six states in similar cases generally ruled that the right of one divorcing spouse to not implant the embryos overrules the right of the other spouse to have them implanted. The Romans' attorneys believe that the case, if appealed to the Supreme Court, could undermine Roe. Some socially conservative legal theorists, who are "buoyed" by the Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold a ban on so-called "partial-birth" abortion, "believe a case involving frozen embryos could give an increasingly conservative court one vehicle for reconsidering" whether embryos have a right to life that is separate from a woman's right to choose abortion. The Texas Supreme Court is not expected to decide whether to hear the case until late this year, and a federal appeal could take several more years, the Times reports (Sack, Los Angeles Times, 5/30).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/72630.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/72630.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




