Papillomavirus Vaccine Could Substantially Reduce Cervical Cancer Incidence
Main Category: Cervical Cancer / HPV VaccineAlso Included In: Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 02 Jun 2007 - 6:00 PDT
Administering Human Papillomavirus Vaccine (HPV) to both sexually active women and those who have never had sex could substantially reduce the incidence of HPV related cervical cancer and precancers, conclude authors of an Article published in this week's edition of the Lancet.
Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in women worldwide, and is caused by infection with oncogenic (cancer causing) types of human papillomavirus. Around 500,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, 80% in developing countries, resulting in 250,000 deaths.
Dr Kevin Ault, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA and colleagues from around the world formed the Future II Study Group to investigate the efficacy of the vaccine.
For women who have never had sex, the vaccine was 99% effective in stopping cervical cancer (adenocarcinoma in situ), and pre-cancerous lesions.
When data from women who could have been exposed was included, the vaccine efficacy was 44%.
The researchers enrolled over 20,000 women aged 15-26 from the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific in the study. Some 9,000 of these were given the full vaccine; around 1,200 were given a component of the vaccine and the rest a placebo.
The women involved were recruited at university student health centres, urban clinics, advertisements and by word of mouth. Healthy women who were not pregnant, had no report of a previous abnormal pap smear, and had a lifetime history of less than four to five sex partners were eligible.
The authors say that further follow-up of large trials will be needed to establish how long the vaccine remains effective.
They conclude: "The results of this quadrivalent HPV vaccine programme provide strong evidence that implementation of HPV vaccination campaigns in pre-adolescent girls and young adult women will reduce rates of cervical cancer worldwide."
In an accompanying comment, Dr Maurie Markman, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, Texas, USA, says a number of questions remain around HPV vaccination, including how long the vaccine will work, the best age at which to administer it, its cost and whether men and boys should also be vaccinated.
He concludes: "Other important hurdles need to be overcome, including: the absence of health-delivery infrastructure in many countries to permit comprehensive vaccination programmes, the politically-charged debate surrounding the issue of voluntary versus mandatory vaccination, the existence of unsubstantiated claims that HPV vaccination will encourage promiscuity, and the belief by some that vaccination is unnecessary in the developed world due to the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies."
###
Contact: Juliette Merchant
Lancet
Visit our cervical cancer / hpv vaccine section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/72795.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/72795.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Cervical Cancer TRUTH
posted by Doreen Carlson on 3 Jun 2007 at 3:10 pmYour article hides the truth in plain sight. Merck's Gardisil vaccine target market is "80% of cervical cancer cases occurring in developing countries"...OUTSIDE THE U.S. Gardisil is heavily promoted here to satisfy Mercks need for a large population, long term study of this brand new product. Better yet, Merck is lobbying politicians to use taxpayer $$ to pay for their product and media hype to recruit subjects to be injected.
The numbers speak the truth - 3500 deaths/14,000 cervical cancer cases out of 151 MILLION American women is a miniscule seven tenths of ONE PERCENT. Yet Merck is marketing it to everyone as if there is immediate substantial benefit! After 3 deaths were reported last week from blood clot formation post-Gardisil, be "one less" guinea pig. You have a 99.27% chance of never needing Gardisil anyway. If they want to market it overseas - let them test it there too.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



