Nexavar Significantly Extends Overall Survival By 44 Percent In Liver Cancer Patients
Main Category: Liver Disease / HepatitisAlso Included In: Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 05 Jun 2007 - 19:00 PDT
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NYSE: BAY) and Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: ONXX) has announced that Nexavar® (sorafenib) tablets significantly extended overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or primary liver cancer versus those taking placebo by 44% (HR=0.69; p-value=0.0006). Results were presented at the 43rd annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
The international, Phase 3, placebo-controlled Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) Trial randomized and evaluated 602 liver cancer patients who had no prior systemic therapy at sites in the Americas, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. The primary objective of the study was to compare overall survival in patients administered Nexavar versus those administered placebo. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in Nexavar-treated patients compared to 7.9 months in those taking placebo.
"Because there are no therapies that significantly improve survival for the thousands of patients with liver cancer, these findings demonstrate the compelling study results of Nexavar as the new reference standard of care for the first-line treatment of HCC," said Dr. Josep M. Llovet, co-principal investigator and Professor of Research, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, IDIBAPS, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic Barcelona; Director of Research, HCC Program, Associate Professor of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York.
Bayer and Onyx halted the SHARP trial in February 2007 when an independent data monitoring committee determined in a pre-scheduled analysis that the overall survival endpoint had been met. There were no significant differences in serious adverse event rates between the Nexavar and placebo-treated groups, with the most commonly observed serious adverse events in patients receiving Nexavar being diarrhea and hand-foot-skin reaction. Based on the strength of the data, the companies are now in the process of preparing applications to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European health authorities for a supplemental indication for Nexavar in treatment of patients with liver cancer.
"Although much progress has been made in cancer research, the number of lives lost to liver cancer is increasing," said Dr. Jordi Bruix, co-principal investigator and Director of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group; Senior Consultant, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. "For that reason, these results represent an unprecedented achievement and Nexavar could become the first widely-approved new therapy for this difficult to treat cancer."
Nexavar's Differentiated Mechanism
Nexavar targets both the tumor cell and tumor vasculature and is the only oral multi-kinase inhibitor that does not require patients to interrupt their treatment schedule.
In preclinical studies, Nexavar has been shown to target members of two classes of kinases known to be involved in both cell proliferation (growth) and angiogenesis (blood supply) - two important processes that enable cancer growth. These kinases included Raf kinase, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-B, KIT, FLT-3 and RET. Preclinical models have also demonstrated that the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway has a role in HCC; therefore blocking signaling through Raf-1 may offer therapeutic benefits in HCC.
Nexavar is currently approved in more than 50 countries, including the United States and those in the European Union, for the treatment of patients with advanced kidney cancer. In Europe, Nexavar is approved for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have failed prior interferon-alpha or interleukin-2 based therapy or are considered unsuitable for such therapy.
Nexavar is also being evaluated by the companies, international study groups, government agencies and/or individual investigators as a single agent or combination treatment in a wide range of other cancers, including adjuvant therapy for kidney cancer, metastatic melanoma, breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Phase 3 ESCAPE (Evaluation of sorafenib, carboplatin, and paclitaxel efficacy in NSCLC) trial recently completed enrollment of more than 900 previously untreated patients with NSCLC of all histologies.
"HCC is the second tumor type in which Nexavar has demonstrated a clinical benefit. We intend to move swiftly with our partner Onyx to file these data for health authority review," said Susan Kelley, MD, Vice President, Therapeutic Area Oncology, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. "Our strategy of leveraging the unique attributes of Nexavar, the only approved orally administered anti-angiogenic that targets the Raf pathway, has led to a robust ongoing clinical program that could bring the potent cancer fighting properties of this oral multi-kinase inhibitor to an even broader number of patients in the coming years."
###
Important Safety Considerations for U.S. Patients Taking Nexavar
Based on the currently approved package insert for the treatment of patients with advanced kidney cancer, hypertension may occur early in the course of therapy and blood pressure should be monitored weekly during the first six weeks of therapy and treated as needed. Incidence of bleeding regardless of causality was 15% for Nexavar vs. 8% for placebo and the incidence of treatment-emergent cardiac ischemia/infarction was 2.9% for Nexavar vs. 0.4% for placebo. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events with Nexavar were diarrhea, rash/desquamation, fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, alopecia, and nausea. Grade 3/4 adverse events were 38% for Nexavar vs. 28% for placebo. Women of child-bearing potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant and advised against breast-feeding. In cases of any severe or persistent side effects, temporary treatment interruption, dose modification or permanent discontinuation should be considered.
For U.S. Nexavar prescribing information, visit http://www.nexavar.com/.
About Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company developing innovative therapies that target the molecular mechanisms that cause cancer. The company is developing Nexavar®, a small molecule drug, with Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Nexavar has been approved for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer. For more information about Onyx's pipeline and activities, visit the company's web site at: http://www.onyx-pharm.com/.
About Bayer HealthCare
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the U.S.-based pharmaceuticals unit of Bayer HealthCare LLC, a division of Bayer AG. One of the world's leading, innovative companies in the healthcare and medical products industry, Bayer HealthCare combines the global activities of the Animal Health, Consumer Care, Diabetes Care, and Pharmaceuticals divisions. In the United States, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals comprises the following business units: Women's Healthcare, Diagnostic Imaging, Specialized Therapeutics, Hematology/Cardiology and Oncology. The company's aim is to discover and manufacture products that will improve human health worldwide by diagnosing, preventing and treating diseases.
About Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Germany
Bayer Schering Pharma is a worldwide leading specialty pharmaceutical company. Its research and business activities are focused on the following areas: Diagnostic Imaging, Hematology/Cardiology, Oncology, Primary Care, Specialized Therapeutics and Women's Healthcare. With innovative products, Bayer Schering Pharma aims for leading positions in specialized markets worldwide. Using new ideas, Bayer Schering Pharma aims to make a contribution to medical progress and strives to improve quality of life.
Forward Looking Statements
This news release contains forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and forecasts made by Bayer Group management. Various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors could lead to material differences between the actual future results, financial situation, development or performance of the company and the estimates given here. These factors include those discussed in Bayer's public reports filed with the Frankfurt Stock Exchange and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (including its Form 20-F). Bayer assumes no liability whatsoever to update these forward-looking statements or to conform them to future events or developments.
This news release also contains "forward-looking statements" of Onyx within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements include without limitation, statements regarding the timing, progress and results of the clinical development, regulatory processes, and commercialization efforts of Nexavar. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those anticipated. Reference should be made to Onyx's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the heading "Risk Factors" and Onyx's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for a more detailed description of such factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date of this release. Onyx undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, events, or circumstances after the date of this release except as required by law. Nexavar® (sorafenib) tablets is a registered trademark of Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Contacts:
Mark Bennett
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals
Julie Wood
Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Jost Reinhard
Bayer Schering Pharma
References
1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/hepatitis/whocdscsrlyo20022/en/. Accessed April 10, 2007
2. Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center College of Medicine. Malignant Hepatoma. Available at: http://www.hmc.psu.edu/healthinfo/m/malignanthepatoma.htm. Accessed April 10, 2007.
3. World Health Organization. Estimates by WHO Region: Incidence. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/gbdwhoregionincidence2002.xls. Accessed April 10, 2007.
4. International Agency for Cancer Research. GLOBOCAN 2002. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/gbdwhoregionincidence2002.xls. Accessed April 23, 2007.
5. Jemal A et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43-66.
6. International Agency for Cancer Research. EUCAN 1998. Available at: http://www-dep.iarc.fr/eucan/eucan.htm. Accessed April 26, 2007.
7. Ferlay J, et al., GLOBOCAN 2002. Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No.5, Version 2.0. IARCPress, Lyon, 2004. Available at: http://www-dep.iarc.fr/. Accessed April 10, 2007.
8. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Eisner MP, Reichman M, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2004, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/, based on November 2006 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2007.
Contact: Charlotte Rocker
GCI Group
Visit our liver disease / hepatitis section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/73065.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/73065.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
Liver Cancer - Will Nexavar Extend Overall Survival For All Patients?
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 29 Jul 2007 at 9:07 amThe eighty extra days is for the group in the study, not the "individual" patients treated in the real world. One person may live two days, another two-hundred additional days. What may work in some patients, may not work in other patients.
If a person in a control group (untreated category) of a clinical trial dies any time while they are being studied, this is recorded as a death in the control group and registered as a failure of the no treatment approach.
However, if patients in the treated category die during the course of treatment (before the course is completed), their cases are rejected from the data since these patients do not then meet the criteria established by definition of the term "treated." A patient dying on day 89 of a prescribed 90-day course of chemotherapy, would be dropped from the list of treated patients.
What's good for the group may not be good for the individual, affirms that in the tactic of using "fresh" biopsied cells to predict which cancer treatments will work best for the individual patient, this "smart" drug has to get inside the cells in order to "target" anything.
If the "targeted" drug either won't "get in" in the first place or if it gets pumped out/extruded or if it gets immediately metabolized inside the cell, it just isn't going to work. Each of these new "targeted" drugs are not for everybody. Even when the disease is the same type, different patients' tumors respond differently to the same agent.
If a drug works extremely well for a certain percentage of cancer patients, identify which ones. If one drug or another is working for some people (not average populations) then obviously there are others out there who would also benefit.
Upgrading clinical therapy by using drug sensitivity assays measuring "cell death" of three dimensional microclusters of live "fresh" tumor cells, can improve the situation by allowing more drugs to be considered. The more drug types there are in the selective arsenal, the more likely the system is to prove beneficial.
Drug sensitivity tests support the idea that a marginal benefit in terms of overall survival is observed in cancer patients with normal prognoses, but there are marked survival benefits for cancer patients with poor prognoses.
What is needed is to sort out what's the best profile in terms of which patients benefit from this drug or any other drug. Can they be combined? What's the proper way to work with these new drugs?
Every cancer patient should have his/her own unique chemotherapy trial based on consultation of pathogenic profiles and drug sensitivity testing data. Having some foreknowledge of a given agent's expected result before its administration would benefit the individual patient.
Re Pawelski
posted by hchcec on 30 Jul 2007 at 8:20 am"Every cancer patient should have his/her own unique chemotherapy trial based on consultation of pathogenic profiles and drug sensitivity testing data. Having some foreknowledge of a given agent's expected result before its administration would benefit the individual patient. "
Every patient should pay $3500 for an unproven test?
No.
In vitro chemosensitivity assays, as a guide to selection of chemotherapeutic drugs for individuals with cancer, are considered not medically necessary IN ALL CASES
In vitro chemoresistance assays including, but not limited to, extreme drug resistance assays are considered not medically necessary IN ALL CASES.
http://medpolicy.bluecrossca.com/policies/LAB/chemo_sensitivity_resistance.html
“Because there are no therapies that significantly improve survival for the thousands of patients with liver cancer, these findings demonstrate the compelling study results of Nexavar as the new REFERENCE STANDARD of care for the first-line treatment of HCC.
"These results represent an unprecedented achievement and Nexavar could become the first widely-approved new therapy for this difficult to treat cancer.”
You don't need an expensive, unproven, assay test to tell you that Nexavar should be used. That's why your oncologist will use this drug for this difficult cancer without the assay. It's an extra, unproven, costly step, that's not needed.
A researcher in the study, Dr. Josep Llovet of the Barcelona Liver Cancer Group and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, said the "unprecedented" study results support Nexavar's use as a new "standard of care" for previously untreated liver cancer patients. Llovet said there are NO other drugs that significantly prolong life patients with this type of cancer.
There is absolutely no need for the HCC patient to pay Pawelski's friends $3500 to test live tumor. This is now the drug of choice so for HCC patients. Why do I need a test to tell me what I already know? It doesn't make any sense ......except to those who make $3500 :-o
Bravo to the developers and researchers.
Measuring Chemotherapy's Success
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 31 Jul 2007 at 12:05 pmWhen discussing the success of chemotherapy in patients, oncologists typically discuss the "response rate." The response rate is a measure of how much a tumor decreased in size or how much a tumor marker declined. It is assumed that a tumor response is equivalent to an increase in survival, but it's not. Actually, tumor responses with chemotherapy for solid tumors have no relationship to an increase in survival. A tumor may temporarily shrink only to explode in growth a short time later. This is especially true for advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
Response rates can be inflated by excluding some patients who died during clinical trials. This is known as counting only "evaluable" patients. Patients not considered evaluable are often those who did not get the benefit of the entire treatment plan. The response rate is calculated after removing certain patients who died from the calculation. This can inflate the response rate.
In addition to to statistical manipulation by excluding patients, response rates are also subject to "observational bias." An "institutional review" can document a response rate of 36%, but when the same patients are seen by the "central review" (doctors less vested in the success of the protocol), the "response rate" could drop to 18%. In other words, the response rate lies in the eyes of the beholder.
If the response rate is subject to statistical manipulation and observational bias, why is it used? Because they are useful for research and publication purposes. Clinical oncologists often want to publish papers for professional reasons. They need to report on the outcomes of their experiments, but if they had to wait for survival data it could take years until all the data was aggregated.
Data on response rates can be collected quickly. It was originally used to equate blood cancers which can often equate with survival (solid cancers do not). Also, it is possible that response rates or improvement rates give clinical oncologists the opportunity to take a more optimistic look at therapies that have limited success. They can describe results as being complete remission, partial remission or simply clinical improvement.
If they treat all patients for three weeks, they can fairly evaluate the "efficacy" of a compound, which takes that long (on average) before it can be regarded as effective. If they disregard all patients who died after onset of therapy, and include only those treated three weeks or more, they can improve their data. Autopsies of the deceased could reveal liver damage. Is this an effect of the drug?
Chemotherapy can significantly prolong survival for some patients with blood and lymph cancers. But there is a long legacy of measuring "response rates" and "improvement rates" and these metrics often have nothing to do with survival or quality of life. It is incumbent on the patient and the patient's professional caregivers to obtain the information needed to make informed treatment decisions.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




