Some Oncologists Look For New Ways To Profit From Cancer Treatments, New York Times Reports

Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Primary Care / General Practice;  Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry
Article Date: 14 Jun 2007 - 20:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

The New York Times on Tuesday examined how limits placed on profits that physicians can make on cancer drugs have left some oncologists "searching for new income," such as by "performing additional treatments that" have "the best reimbursements, whether or not the treatments" benefit the patients. Medicare until 2005 paid a markup of 20% to 100% for many cancer drugs, along with injectable treatments for arthritis and other diseases.

In 2005, Congress changed the reimbursement system to pay physicians 6% more than the average price for a given treatment. The reduction in reimbursements "did not reduce overall federal spending on cancer care," which has increased slightly in the last two years, and the difference in spending "mostly represented profit that doctors had made on the drugs," the Times reports. However, cancer doctors say the "change did nothing to reduce a larger problem in cancer treatment," according to the Times.

The decrease in payments has made it difficult for smaller practices to break even on cancer drug purchases because the practices often do not buy enough of any drug to receive rebates or discounts from drug manufacturers. Some oncologists have attempted to increase profits by "performing chemotherapy more often or installing multimillion-dollar imaging machines where they profit when their patients receive diagnostic scans" and by "putting new pressure on cancer patients to make out-of-pocket drug copayments," according to the Times.

The situation "offers a vivid example of how difficult it may be to rein in the nation's runaway health care spending without fundamentally changing the way doctors are paid," the Times reports. Robert Geller, a former oncologist and senior medical director at Alexion Pharmaceuticals, said oncologists likely will continue to find ways to profit from Medicare as long as they are paid by procedure and not for time spent with patients (Berenson [1], New York Times, 6/12).

Drug Makers Encourage Profits
In related news, the Times examines how before the change to Medicare reimbursements for cancer treatments, pharmaceutical companies "sometimes calculated to the penny the profits that doctors could make from their drugs" and sales representatives from the companies "shared those profit estimates with doctors and their staffs," according to industry documents that have become public in a federal civil lawsuit against drug makers. The lawsuit, filed by cancer patients and health insurers, alleges that marketing practices of drug companies caused them to be overcharged for oncology medicines because list prices for the drugs were higher than the actual cost of the drugs for physicians (Berenson [2], New York Times, 6/12).

"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

• Additional
• References
• Citations