UAW Reaches Agreement With Auto Parts Manufacturer On Health Care Trust
Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical InsuranceAlso Included In: Seniors / Aging; Rehabilitation / Physical Therapy
Article Date: 11 Jul 2007 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
Automotive part manufacturer Dana announced on Friday it has reached a four-year agreement with United Auto Workers and United Steelworkers to transfer retiree health care and long-term disability liabilities to two health care trust funds, generally known as voluntary employer benefit associations, the New York Times reports (Maynard, New York Times, 7/7). Dana filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March 2006.
The trust fund is expected to save Dana more than $100 million annually, according to the company (Seewer, AP/Wilmington News Journal, 7/6). Dana will contribute about $700 million in cash to the fund and an additional $80 million in stock after the company reorganizes.
The agreement gives "a glimpse of the kind of steps the UAW is willing to consider, at least in the case of companies in dire straits," which could affect contract negotiations that start July 23 with the Big Three auto manufacturers, according to the Times. However, UAW leaders "have maintained that the deals reached at bankrupt companies should not be viewed as a road map of what might happen in the talks" in July, the Times reports (New York Times, 7/7).
Dana will present the plan in U.S. Bankruptcy Court on July 25. Dana's United Steelworkers' employees are scheduled to vote on the fund on July 20. UAW did not say when its Dana employees would vote (Ramsey, Bloomberg/Washington Post, 7/7).
Big Three Negotiations
The Los Angeles Times on Monday examined how "reducing health care costs is expected to be the driving issue for" General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler during contract negotiations in July. As of the end of 2006, the three automakers combined had around $90 billion in underfunded retiree health obligations, which the companies say need to be reduced in order to stay competitive with Asian auto manufacturers.
GM spokesperson Dan Flores said the difference between U.S. and Japanese automakers' health costs is a "significant competitive gap." Flores added, "Based on the magnitude of the cost, health care will continue to be a discussion point for GM and the UAW." However, the extent of concessions UAW will be willing to grant the automakers "is unclear," according to the Times (Zimmerman/Huffstutter, Los Angeles Times, 7/9).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/76327.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/76327.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



