New Medicare Regulations Adopted To Reduce Certain Hospital Infections And Medical Errors
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPAlso Included In: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses; Litigation / Medical Malpractice; Public Health
Article Date: 09 Aug 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.57 (14 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Under new Medicare regulations, hospitals will no longer receive higher payments for the additional costs associated with treating patients for certain hospital- acquired infections and medical errors. The new rules will give hospitals a powerful new incentive to improve patient care, according to Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports.
"Every year, millions of Americans suffer needlessly from preventable hospital infections and medical errors," said Lisa McGiffert, Director of Consumers Union's Stop Hospital Infections' campaign. "These new rules are a good beginning for Medicare to use its clout to mobilize hospitals to improve care and keep patients safe."
Under the rules adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), payments will be withheld from hospitals for care associated with treating certain catheter-associated urinary tract infections, vascular catheter-associated infections, mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and five other medical errors unrelated to infections (bed sores, objects left in patients' bodies, blood incompatibility, air embolism, and falls). The new rules will go into effect in October 2008.
To comply with a 2005 law passed by Congress, CMS evaluated a number of serious, preventable health care acquired conditions and identified these eight for the first round of non-payment due to the high volume of patients affected, the high cost of treating patients, and the existence of prevention guidelines. The agency intends to consider other hospital acquired infections and medical errors for non-payment in future years.
The new Medicare regulations include protections to prevent hospitals from billing patients when payments are withheld and to minimize avoidance of patients perceived to be at risk for infections. "We are pleased that the rules clearly state that hospitals cannot bill patients for the amount that Medicare refuses to pay," said McGiffert. "CMS will need to make sure these protections are enforced so patients are treated fairly. And the agency should be on the lookout for hospitals that try to game the system by falsifying codes to avoid nonpayment."
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are the most common infection developed by patients in hospitals. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that there are 561,667 catheter-associated urinary tract infections per year. According to a study in the American Journal of Medicine, the annual cost of urinary tract infections in hospitals is as much as $451 million.
Bloodstream infections are high in volume and cost, and are preventable. The CDC has reported that there are 248,678 cases of central line associated bloodstream infections every year. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement estimates that approximately 14,000 people die every year from central line- related bloodstream infections.
CMS failed to address the incidence of infections caused by methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a virulent antibiotic resistant bacterium. According to CMS, over 95,000 Medicare patients had MRSA infections in 2005, running up hospital charges of almost $3 billion. MRSA was not selected for nonpayment because of coding issues and because CMS does "not believe there is a consensus among public health experts that MRSA [infection] is preventable."
"CMS needs to take strong action to curb the spread of this powerful superbug," said McGiffert. "Many hospitals do not share the attitude that MRSA infections cannot be prevented and CMS should be on the front lines with them fighting this deadly and costly problem."
Hospital-acquired infections are a leading cause of death in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 2 million patients suffer from hospital infections every year and nearly 100,000 of them die. Research shows that hospitals could prevent many infections through stricter adherence to proven infection control practices.
The financial costs associated with hospital infections are equally staggering. Dr. John A. Jernigan, Chief of Interventions and Evaluations at the CDC, has said that hospital-acquired infections result in up to $27.5 billion in additional health care expenses annually. Medicare foots the bill for a big portion of infection-related health care costs. A 2005 report by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council found that Medicare was billed for 67 percent of the total number of patient infections reported by the state's hospitals.
"Taxpayers spend billions of dollars every year covering the cost of patient infections," said McGiffert. "Restricting Medicare payments for medical errors like patient infections will help ensure that the health care taxpayers pay for is safe and effective."
Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, is an independent, nonprofit testing and information organization serving only the consumer. We are a comprehensive source of unbiased advice about products and services, personal finance, health, nutrition, and other consumer concerns. Since 1936, our mission has been to test products, inform the public, and protect consumers. http://www.StopHospitalInfections.org, a project of Consumers Union, advocates for public disclosure of hospital-acquired infection rates.
Consumers Union
http://www.StopHospitalInfections.org
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/79167.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/79167.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Responsible For Obese, Diabetic And Compromised Immune Systems?
posted by Gaby-impoverished-MI on 19 Aug 2007 at 7:54 pmHospitals should not be responsible/ accountable for all infections developed during a hospital stay, specially if PT's are obese, diabetic or have compromised immune system. A large percentage of the population fit this description. It would not be right for hospitals to be responsible for diabetics who are know for having poor circulation therefore poor healers and are at greater risk for infections. Nurses/doc's do their best in providing excellent care. Government wants to cut cost, let's stop providing free care to non Citizens or women who continue to have several babies at tax payers expense. To have hospital accountable 100% for all the infection is unfair. Yes we could do more to improve are techniques, but people have to be more accountable for their health and actions. The amount of obese Pt entering the ER is disgusting which go hand in hand with diabetes. Nurses and hospital personal get injured taking care of these types of people everyday!. Insurance company need to increase payments/co-pays to this population or deny coverage to those irresponsible women who continue to have babies. Reward those who care about their health and are conscious of their expenses . Let start there with cost cut. I believe this will cause economical detrimental effects to hospitals who have to absorb the cost of every infection developed during a Pt's hospital stay. We have a nursing shortage.... This new medicare rule will cause an epidemic nursing shortage crises.
Treating Patients
posted by Anon on 1 Nov 2007 at 5:04 pmI agree that all infections do not occur in hospital settings, there is such a thing known as community aquired infections. But it does not excuse the medical community either. I have worked in the hospital setting and know that the nursing shortage you speak of is one of the main reasons for so many infections. I have seen first hand the neglect and problems that cause this. Most of the time it is not intentional. Do you realize the people that are coming into the hospital with these infections who have never been in the hospital.
I cannot see denying treatment to any person who is truly sick because of their weight, compromised immunity, lack of insurance and or any other reason. Sick is sick, human is human, fight the disease not the people who are sick. I believe everyone should be aware of the disease and take the measures to prevent it and control it, medical or otherwise. People are not really aware or concerned until sickness affects them or someone they love. Then they tend to get involved.
In my opinion we should all work together healthcare workers, patients, communities and government to make sure that people stay healthy,are insured, and are taken care of when sickness happens to the very best of our ability as compassionate human beings ourselves. If we all try to do the best we can when one falls short maybe another can succeed.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




