Coalition Pushes For State Cigarette Tax Increase To Fund Children's Health Care
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingAlso Included In: Pediatrics / Children's Health; Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 16 Aug 2007 - 11:00 PDT
The Healthy Kids Oregon coalition on Thursday launched a campaign in support of a state ballot measure that would increase cigarette taxes to provide health care for more than 100,000 uninsured Oregon children, the Oregonian reports. The group has raised approximately $700,000 in cash and commitments for the campaign, which is urging voters to support Measure 50 in the Nov. 6 election, according to campaign manager Carol Butler.
The ballot measure would amend the state constitution to increase cigarette taxes by 84.5 cents per pack. The measure would generate an estimated $153 million from 2007 to 2009 and $233 million from 2009 to 2011. Democratic lawmakers this year were unable to secure a three-fifths majority in the state Legislature, which was needed to pass legislation to raise the tax, but there were enough votes to put it on the ballot as a constitutional measure.
Lobbyist Mark Nelson, whose clients include the tobacco industry, said if cigarette makers "decide to oppose [the measure], they'll form a political action committee and file with the secretary of the state." He added that the tobacco industry objects to how the funds would be used, as well as the constitutional amendment. "I don't know of any time in the country we've had a tax on a single product and put it in the constitution," Nelson said.
Coalition members include the American Cancer Society; the American Heart Association; the American Lung Association; Oregon PTA; Children First for Oregon; several unions; and physicians, nurses and other health care advocates (Graves, Oregonian, 8/10).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/79676.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/79676.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Cigarette Tax Increase
posted by steve d on 5 Sep 2007 at 6:44 pmThey care about collecting money, not spending it on children,, is point # 1, They also should be EVERYBIT as much concerned about the people paying tax's (children don't),, don't the Tax paying public deserve health care??? If even 10 cent's on the dollar collected with the new tax was used to help anyone other than Politicians,, it would not only be the first Trueth, but an amazing one, given by a political person in Washington for any new tax, no matter where it come's from,,,
Retard Math
posted by Jim on 29 Sep 2007 at 8:21 amGeneral plan: Raise taxes on cigarettes to help fund children's medical program.
Considered bonus: Raising tax will get more people to quit smoking, which will keep us all "healthier".
Reason this is retarded: If you are raising a tax on something to fund a major program that is very expensive, but are actually counting on the group you are raising the tax on to diminish BECAUSE of the tax, you are a moron. It is likely that enough people will quit smoking to bring the actual money brought in by the tax back to the normal level of income, if not lower. Less people smoking means less people paying, which means they raise the tax again, which means less people smoke...again. This goes on until no one smokes, or a pack costs two hundred million dollars in order to still cover the funding costs of the children's program. If smokers revenue dissappears, where does the money come from to fund the program? The program certainly doesn't go away, which means the tax gets moved elsewhere...which of course inhibits growth, or eradicates yet another group of individuals habits, depending on the type of tax. People supporting this tax are seriously short sighted, irresponsible individuals. Government officials are not included in this statement, because a tax increase of any kind benefits their position as it empowers them by increasing civil dependency on the establishment. However, in this case in particular there is no doubt they are playing on the ignorance of the populace, not actually caring about the collective well being of their children.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





