North Carolina Health Commission Recommends Requiring HIV Testing Among Pregnant Women
Main Category: HIV / AIDSAlso Included In: Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Article Date: 29 Aug 2007 - 7:00 PDT
The North Carolina Commission for Public Health on Wednesday voted to recommend requiring HIV tests for all pregnant women in the state immediately before delivery if they have not already been tested in the third trimester of pregnancy, the AP/Myrtle Beach News & Observer reports. Under current regulations, pregnant women in the state are given the option of receiving an HIV test as part of prenatal care. The regulation would require women who come to a medical facility to deliver to be tested if their HIV/AIDS status is unknown. The commission, which makes rules for medical practitioners in the state, also recommended requiring HIV testing for infants who are brought to a medical facility (AP/Myrtle Beach News & Observer, 8/24). The regulation must be approved by the North Carolina Rules Review Commission, and it is unclear when it would take effect. "Our goal is to not have any babies born in our state with HIV infection," state Health Director Leah Devlin said, adding, "There is no excuse for it. There are a lot of available medications and other things we can do that can reduce the transmission to infants, and we need to put in place every tool that we have to do that" (Quillin, Raleigh News & Observer, 8/25).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our hiv / aids section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/80751.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/80751.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
A First Step For North Carolina's Lack Of Disclosure Laws?
posted by Anon on 29 Aug 2007 at 9:39 amEarly diagnosis and treatment of HIV is key to managing the healthcare of those already infected. But what is of as great a concern is that for some reason, North Carolina lacks a law requiring those already infected with HIV/ AIDS to inform sex partners of their serostatus BEFORE sexual contact occurs, as is required by law in the majority of other states in the USA. Without fear of legal repurcussions of keeping such vital information secret, their is little cause for those so inclined to not inform sex partners or to modify their sexual behaviors/ practices. As fine as North Carolina's Public Health policies are, this is one omission that is placing an increased burden on precious healthcare resources and costing lives.
It is hoped that this new law will encourage responsible public dialog and bring about a mandatory HIV pre-disclosure law in the State of North Caolina. Mandatory pre-disclosure of one's HIV-positive serostatus is but one step in prevention needed to stem the pandemic of HIV/ AIDS.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




