Warning: Keep Mobile Phones Away From Hospital Beds
Main Category: Medical Devices / DiagnosticsAlso Included In: Public Health; IT / Internet / E-mail
Article Date: 09 Sep 2007 - 14:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.8 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.9 (10 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Mobile phones should come no closer than one meter to hospital beds and equipment, according Dutch research published in the online open access journal, Critical Care. Scientists demonstrated that incidents of electromagnetic interference (EMI) from second and third generation mobile phones occurred at a mere three-centimeter distance.
In this particular study, the research team examined the effects of General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) signals on critical care equipment such as ventilators and pacemakers. Almost 50 EMI incidents were recorded; 75% were significant or hazardous. Hazardous incidents varied from a total switch off and restart of mechanical ventilator and complete stops without alarms in syringe pumps to incorrect pulsing by an external pacemaker.
The second generation (2.5G) GPRS signal caused the highest number of EMI incidents at over 60% whereas the third generation (3G) UMTS signal was responsible for just 13%. EMI incidents also occurred a greater distance with GPRS with a hazardous incident even at three meters.
While first generation mobile phones are used mainly for voice transmission, 2.5G and 3G phones enable internet access, sending and receiving data. They entered the market, however, with little proof regarding their safe use in the medical environment.
Dr Erik van Lieshout, lead researcher from the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, said; "Our work has real implications for present hospital restrictions of mobile phone use in patient areas."
"It is unlikely that mobile phone induced EMI in hospitals will be eradicated in the near future so the one meter rule currently in place should continue, as it is relatively safe," commented Dr van Lieshout.
###
Article:
Interference by new generations mobile phones on critical care medical equipment
Erik Jan van Lieshout, Sabine N van der Veer, Reinout Hensbroek, Johanna C Korevaar, Margreeth B Vroom and Marcus J Schultz
Critical Care (in press)
Source: Charlotte Webber
BioMed Central
Visit our medical devices / diagnostics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/81663.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/81663.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Wondering?
posted by Saad Ibrahim on 12 Sep 2007 at 4:29 amActually i've been reading about this subject and all kinds of contradictions i've faced regarding EMI. one example is this articale i've read:
“There is no problem in having E.A.S. systems,” said Dr. J. Rod Gimbel, a co-author of the study and a cardiologist at East Tennessee Heart Consultants in Knoxville. “But it would be good practice to educate the staffs of retail stores about the problem.”
Jim Vanderpool, product health and safety director for Sensormatic Electronics, the manufacturer of the surveillance machines involved in both incidents, said in an e-mail message that the company had “no independent information regarding the two specific cases,” but that the article reinforced the scientific consensus “that patients with medical implants like pacemakers and defibrillators should simply walk through electronic antitheft systems at a normal pace.”
After that, two reports published in the March issue of The Mayo Clinic Proceedings suggest that the dangers of radio wave interference with implanted medical devices are real but modest, and that cellphones in hospitals present no danger at all.
]
Any ways, also ive read an interesting subject about special operational frequencies (WTMS) that will be implemented in hospitals. It demonestrates certain frequencies for certain applications. I guess this solves the problem of cellular phones.
so anyone have any idea about this?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



