Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Minimum 5 Year Follow-Up Of The First 100 UK Cases
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Men's health
Article Date: 10 Sep 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.17 (6 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
UroToday.com - Presented Monday, 03 September 2007 at the 29th Congress of the Societe International d'Urologie - SIU 2007 - Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in Prostate and Renal Cell Carcinomas - The Second Annual Symposium on Advanced GU Malignancy - Palais des Congres de Paris, France
Introduction and Objectives: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) continues to develop as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical prostatectomy. We present the results of the first 100 cases performed in the UK with a minimum of five years follow-up.
Material and Methods: 100 patients underwent transperitoneal LRP performed by a single surgeon during a 25 month period from 2000-2002. Mean age was 62 years (range 52-72). Most (78%) patients had a PSA between 4 and 10, clinical stage T1 disease (62%), and Gleason 6 on biopsy (50%). Sixty-four percent of patients underwent unilateral or bilateral nerve preservation and 14% had pelvic lymphadenectomy performed.
Results: Mean operating time was 245 minutes, with a 1% conversion rate. Three percent of patients received a blood transfusion and 3% had major complications, including a rectal injury. The positive margin rate was 16% and correlated with pathological parameters. At a minimum of 5 years follow-up (mean = 5.7 years) overall survival was 99% and biochemical progression-free survival was 86% in all patients: 89.3% for pT2, and 73% for pT3. Ninety percent of patients used 0-1 pads/ day (84% pad-free) and 60% of patients undergoing nerve preservation retained erectile function.
Conclusions: This series represents the first 5-year minimum follow-up results for LRP performed in the UK, with morbidity and functional and oncological results which are comparable to previously published open radical prostatectomy (ORP) series. The ORP literature suggests that as the technique of LRP evolves and experience with it grows that these results are likely to be surpassed.
Authors: Merilees D, Chabert C, Eden C
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
----------------------------
Copyright © 2007 - UroToday
Reproduced for Medical News Today with permission of UroToday.
----------------------------
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/81977.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/81977.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




