Federal Judge Rules That Attorneys For Abortion Provider Tiller Cannot Prevent Grand Jury From Being Formed To Investigate Tiller

Main Category: Abortion
Also Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice;  Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 17 Sep 2007 - 2:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

U.S. District Judge J. Thomas Marten on Tuesday ruled against a motion to prevent a grand jury from convening in Sedgwick County, Kan., to investigate abortion provider George Tiller, the Wichita Eagle reports (Lefler, Wichita Eagle, 9/12). The antiabortion group Kansans for Life last week delivered a petition that contained 7,857 signatures asking the Sedgwick County District Court to convene a grand jury and appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate Tiller. Petitioners want the grand jury to examine late-term abortions that Tiller performed during the past five years and the reasons cited for the abortions (Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 9/7).

Sedgwick County Election Commissioner Bill Gale on Tuesday certified the petition and sent it to Sedgwick County Administrative Judge Michael Corrigan. Gale said the petitioners submitted 6,683 valid signatures, more than the 2,449 needed to convene a grand jury.

Tiller Motion, Reaction
Tiller's attorneys filed a motion requesting that the grand jury not be convened, claiming that Tiller has been investigated several times in the past year and that another grand jury investigation would be "unfair, harassing and bad faith." According to the Eagle, if the grand jury is seated, it will conduct at least the fifth investigation of Tiller since 2006, including a pending case in which state Attorney General Paul Morrison (D) has charged Tiller with 19 misdemeanors for allegedly violating a state law that requires an independent, consulting physician to approve some late-term abortions.

Tiller's attorneys in the motion said the petition to convene a grand jury is "part of a repeated, persistent and harassing effort to induce criminal prosecution" of Tiller "by those who oppose lawful abortion." Marten said that Tiller's lawyers made a strong case, but added, "Frankly, I'm reluctant to jump into the middle of something that is essentially a state matter." Marten suggested that Tiller's attorneys re-file the motion in state court, and Tiller's attorneys said they plan to do so (Wichita Eagle, 9/12).

Kansans for Life leaders said they were unaware that Tiller's attorneys had sought to prevent state courts from convening a grand jury. David Gittrich, development director of Kansans for Life, said that if the motion had been granted, it would have been an insult to those who signed the petition and to state lawmakers seeking to change abortion policy. He added that the group hopes the grand jury will file charges against Tiller similar to those filed by former Attorney General Phill Kline (R) (Wichita Eagle, 9/12).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

• Additional
• References
• Citations