Catheter Angiography May Be An Unnecessary Follow Up To CT Angiography For Some Blunt Trauma Patients

Main Category: MRI / PET / Ultrasound
Also Included In: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine;  Cardiovascular / Cardiology
Article Date: 21 Sep 2007 - 0:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  


Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:4 stars

4 (1 votes)


Even in challenging cases, CT angiography (CTA) offers an accurate and rapid diagnosis for blunt trauma victims who may have aortic or great vessel injury negating the need for more invasive procedures, according to a recent study conducted by radiologists at the University of Washington and the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center in Seattle, WA. CTA is commonly used to rule out blunt aortic and intrathoracic great vessel injuries, but sometimes the results are indeterminate, said Marla Sammer, MD, lead author of the study. When the results are indeterminate, a subsequent catheter angiography is usually performed.

"Aortic injury is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality following blunt trauma, especially motor vehicle collisions. If aortic injury is not diagnosed quickly, morbidity and mortality are significantly increased," CT angiography offers a much more rapid diagnosis than traditional catheter aortography, and it is noninvasive. Given these potential significant benefits, we undertook this study to determine if patients can be spared catheter angiogram when the CT angiogram is indeterminate for aortic injury," Dr. Sammer said.

The study consisted of 72 patients who had bleeding and other injuries around the aorta who underwent both CTA and invasive catheter angiography. The CTA results were noted as being indeterminate. Of the 72 patients, no aortic injuries were missed by CTA.

Our study adds to the growing evidence that catheter angiography may be unnecessary in cases where the CT angiogram is indeterminate for aortic injury," Dr. Sammer said.

"If CT angiography is used alone, the patient can be spared an invasive catheter angiogram, risks of which include vascular injury, hemorrhage, infection, and even death," said Dr. Sammer. "Furthermore, since patients with suspected aortic injury often have multiple other life threatening injuries, the time that would be spent performing the catheter angiogram can be used instead to more rapidly diagnosis and treat other injuries.

The full results of this study appear in the September issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology, published by the American Roentgen Ray Society.

American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS)
44211 Slatestone Ct.
Leesburg, VA 20176-5109
United States
http://www.arrs.org

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our mri / pet / ultrasound section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
American Roentgen Ray Society. "Catheter Angiography May Be An Unnecessary Follow Up To CT Angiography For Some Blunt Trauma Patients." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 21 Sep. 2007. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/83170.php>

APA
American Roentgen Ray Society. (2007, September 21). "Catheter Angiography May Be An Unnecessary Follow Up To CT Angiography For Some Blunt Trauma Patients." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/83170.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.




MRI / PET / Ultrasound

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our MRI News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our MRI / PET / Ultrasound Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »