Vaccine Study In New England Journal Of Medicine Wrong In Concluding Mercury Exposures Are Harmless, States SafeMinds
Main Category: AutismAlso Included In: Immune System / Vaccines; Public Health; Neurology / Neuroscience
Article Date: 27 Sep 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.9 (10 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.56 (9 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
A Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study on the relationship between mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines and children's brain functioning draws a misleading conclusion, says one of the study's external consultants, Sallie Bernard, Executive Director of SafeMinds.
"Early Thimerosal Exposure and Neuropsychological Outcomes at 7 to 10 Years," appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM, 9/27/07 issue), concludes that the study "does not support a causal association" between thimerosal and neuropsychological outcomes in children. The conclusion misleads the public, implying without qualification that a relationship has been disproved. In fact, "the study was unable to prove either the presence or absence of a causal relationship," noted Bernard, the panel's only consumer representative.
According to Bernard, unlike gold-standard randomized clinical trials, an observational study such as this cannot address causation. If, however, the findings confirm those of other studies, it can contribute to assessments of causality. This study confirmed associations detected in other studies, such as increased rates of motor and verbal tics and poorer language ability. Replication of previous studies was noted in the text but ignored in the Abstract and Concluding statement, which are the sections routinely read by the wider public.
The study's many limitations preclude sweeping conclusions on thimerosal's effects. The small sample size and few children in the highest and lowest exposure groups reduced the study's precision and ability to establish statistical significance. The study only obtained a 30% participation rate, well below the commonly accepted scientific standard of 70%. Early interventions which may have reduced or eliminated some deficits such as speech delays by age 7 to 10 years were not controlled. An analysis of combined prenatal and postnatal mercury exposures was lacking. Newborns weighing 5 lbs 8 ounces or less (9% of births) were excluded even though these infants may be more vulnerable to mercury's effects.
The conclusions should have referenced these and other limitations, as well as confirming thimerosal-associated impairments found in other studies, and as a result, called for further investigation. "Children in the U.S. and worldwide are still given vaccines containing mercury. Health officials should be erring on the side of caution," said Bernard. The data set will be made available to other researchers by the CDC, and Bernard hopes other scientists will apply alternative methodologies to study this important public health issue. She has asked the NEJM to publish her dissenting comments when the study appears online at http://www.nejm.org.
SafeMinds focuses on the role of mercury in neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. This study did not address autism. A separate CDC-sponsored study investigating thimerosal and autism is underway.
SafeMinds
http://www.nejm.org
Visit our autism section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/83770.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/83770.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
One Side Of The Story
posted by Krinsky NP on 27 Sep 2007 at 10:33 pmUnfortunately this article only points out the few limitations in the study. It does not mention the many strengths of the study. As research builds in this area, the conclusions increasingly point to a genetic cause for many neuropsychological disorders like autism. Instead of focusing on proving a link between vaccines and autism, which to date not been supported by any clinical evidence, resources should shift to treatment and early intervention. For an unbiased view read the actual study and decide for yourself.
Wich Is The True Side Of The Story?
posted by Ana Santos on 20 Jan 2008 at 1:20 pmUnfortunately there are people that insist only on a genetic cause for Autism or other kind of neuropsychological problems cause it`s easier to say it than to prove it. Even when you never had anyone in your families (mother e father) and your genetic tests are negatives people still insist on this ,putting a stigma in this families.I think maybe there are a genetic tendency of certain families but it doesn't prove cause-effect.Maybe there are something else that causes the autism symptoms.Maybe we need more autistics to see something`s wrong!
Study Was Too Limited
posted by barb on 13 Feb 2009 at 4:51 amThe problem with the vaccine study was mercury was singled out and the rest of the vaccine was assumed to be safe. What about the aluminum? What about the rest of the ingredients? We know a little about acupuncture and the Japanese/Chinese have experimented with giving shots in acupunture points which definitely has an effect. Could the vaccine been given in an acupunture point that leads to the brain? What about vaccinating children who are only slightly sick? This is supposed to be safe. Any studies proving it is safe? What about the ingredients that are trade secrets and not listed on the vaccine insert? Autistic children often have food allergies and vaccines are the most likely cause of the food allergies. Traces of food protein remain in the vaccines from the culture medium and the mixed oils used in the vaccine adjuvant.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





