Chemotherapy Treatment Taxol Ineffective In Treating HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer, NEJM Study Says
Main Category: Breast CancerArticle Date: 12 Oct 2007 - 7:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.67 (12 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The chemotherapy treatment paclitaxel, sold by Bristol-Myers Squibb under the brand name Taxol, is ineffective at treating HER-2 negative breast cancer, the most common form of the disease, according to a study published Thursday in the New England Journal of Medicine, the AP/Google.com reports.
Daniel Hayes of the University of Michigan and colleagues analyzed a study conducted in the 1990s that involved more than 3,000 women whose breast cancer had spread to the lymph nodes but not widely throughout the body (Marchione, AP/Google.com, 10/10). Half of the participants in the original study received four courses of the chemotherapy drugs adriamycin and cytoxan, and half received four courses of the adriamycin-cytoxan combination along with four courses of Taxol, which is standard protocol among many oncologists (AFP/Yahoo! News, 10/10).
The researchers then conducted genetic tests on the original tumor tissue of 1,322 of the women (Fox, Reuters, 10/10). Women who had overactive HER-2 positive tumors, about 15% to 20% of all breast cancer patients, benefited the most from treatment with Taxol, the study found (Ackerman, Houston Chronicle, 10/11). The study was funded by NIH and a breast cancer foundation, and several researchers have ties to BMS (AP/Google.com, 10/10).
Reaction
The researchers did not recommend changes in protocol for breast cancer treatment and added that further studies are needed to confirm the finding (Houston Chronicle, 10/11). "We want to make sure these data are correct before withholding [Taxol] from some patients," Hayes said, adding, "On the other hand, we don't want to keep a therapy that doesn't work." Julie Gralow, a cancer specialist at the University of Washington School of Medicine, said that many doctors will be reluctant to forgo treatment with Taxol until the study's findings are confirmed because of concern that some patients might file a lawsuit if their cancer returns and chemotherapy was not offered (AP/Google.com, 10/10).
Don Berry, biostatistics chief at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, said that the "most important question in invasive breast cancer is who does and doesn't need chemotherapy?" Berry said, "We're good at adding therapies to a patient's regimen, but not as confident subtracting them. This study suggests we'll be able to limit therapies to those who'll truly benefit from them, and other patients can be spared their side effects without loss of benefit."
Related Editorial
Ann Moore of the Weill Cornell Medical College in an NEJM editorial that accompanied the study writes that the "one-size-fits-all" approach to breast cancer treatment is coming to an end. "Oncologists have a responsibility to their patients to be aware of this report," Moore writes (Houston Chronicle, 10/11).
The study is available online.
NBC's "Nightly News" on Wednesday reported on the study. The segment includes comments from Hayes, Dennis Slamon of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California-Los Angeles and a breast cancer patient who took Taxol (Bazell, "Nightly News," NBC, 10/10). The program on Wednesday also included a discussion with Susan Love, president and medical director of the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation, about the study and other breast cancer research (Williams, "Nightly News," NBC, 10/10). Video of the segments is available online.
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/85301.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/85301.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Personalized Cancer Medicine
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 12 Oct 2007 at 3:20 pmThe hallmark of cancer is heterogeneity. Not just many types of cancer (breast, lung, colon, ovary, etc.), but very many subtypes of cancer within a given type. Many types of breast cancer. Many types of lung cancer, etc. The biologies are very different and the response to given drugs is very different.
The hallmark of cancer treatment is heterogeneity. There are many FDA-approved cancer drugs, with hundreds in the pipeline. All of these drugs tend to be partially effective, and, even then, in only a minority of cases, and often for only a short duration of time.
The single most neglected area of cancer research has been the development of methods and technologies to be matchmakers between individual cancer with individual cancer treatment.
The single most neglected area of cancer treatment has been an unwillingness to utilize the "matchmaker" technologies which have already been developed and which are already available. These technologies involve studies of cancer cell responses to drug exposure in cell culture systems, outside of the patient's body.
There is an emerging awareness in the importance of the hallmark of cancer and the hallmark of its treatment - heterogeneity. So there is a rush to develop new "matchmaker" techologies, based around so-called "molecular" approaches. These latter technologies might be considered "sub-cellular" assays, to distinguish them from the "cellular" assays which have already been developed and which are already available.
There should be an immediate recognition that matchmaking between cancer and cancer treatment is one area in cancer research and treatment which is deserving of much greater attention and utilization. There should be an inclusive effort to study and utilize technologies which are based on both the sub-cellular ("molecular") level and at the cellular (cell function/cell culture) level.
Several developments in recent years help doctors pick who really needs it. The realization that breast cancers have different causes, arise from different types of cells, are driven by different genes, and tend to be different in women before or after menopause.
An effort should begin with a serious review and consideration of all existing technologies, including those which have been irresponsibly ignored by the vast majority of academic and community oncologists, in their irrational and futile attempts to improve the results of cancer treatment through trying to identify the "best" treatment for the average patient, in a disease notorious for its heterogeneity, where virtually no patient is "average."
We should use the biology of the cancer to decide whether the chemotherapy will work before subjecting women to it. The problem is that few drugs work the way oncologists think and few of them take the time to think through what it is they are using them for. More emphasis should be put on matching treatment to the patient - personalized medicine.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




