National Right To Life Committee Defends Brownback's Talks With Giuliani On Abortion Views
Main Category: AbortionAlso Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 31 Oct 2007 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.75 (4 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The National Right to Life Committee recently defended Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) after he was criticized for meeting with former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is running for the Republican presidential nomination, to discuss Giuliani's views on abortion, The Hill reports (Bolton, The Hill, 10/26).
Brownback last week said he is "much more comfortable" with Giuliani's position on abortion after meeting with him in Washington, D.C. Brownback withdrew from the presidential race earlier this month, and some of the Republican candidates have been seeking his endorsement (Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 10/30).
Criticism Against Brownback, NRLC Letter
NRLC in a letter sent to Brownback on Friday pledged to continue supporting him as a leading antiabortion-rights advocate whether he decides to endorse Giuliani for the Republican presidential nomination, The Hill reports. The letter was sent after James Bopp -- general counsel for NRLC and a prominent legal advocate for conservative antiabortion groups -- criticized Brownback over the meeting. Bopp is a volunteer for the presidential campaign of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R).
"Brownback is angling for some personal political benefit by cozying up to Giuliani," Bopp told the blog "Talking Points Memo." Bopp also suggested that Brownback was being partial by meeting with Giuliani and not Romney, adding that his meeting with Giuliani was "surprising in light of his unwillingness to accept Romney's conversion" on abortion issues, "which happened several years ago. Now he's willing to accept Giuliani's statements of the last day or so."
NRLC said that Bopp's remarks, "if accurately reported, do not represent National Right to Life, and we disagree with them." In comments directed toward Brownback, the group said, "All of us who know you personally recognize that your commitment to the pro-life cause is deep and heartfelt. We know this because we have worked shoulder to shoulder with you on such important pro-life issues," including so-called "partial-birth abortion, fetal pain, ultrasound and human cloning." The letter added, "We reject emphatically anyone's suggestion that you have sacrificed or would sacrifice the interests of the unborn in order to garner some 'personal political benefit.'"
Reaction
David O'Steen, executive director of NRLC, said that the purpose of the letter was to clarify that the group does not endorse Bopp's comments. "We wanted to clarify that we have utmost confidence in Mr. Brownback's integrity," he said. O'Steen added that Brownback is a "leader of the pro-life movement because he's taken a leadership role in promoting pro-life policies and leadership positions" and that there is no reason why a meeting or an endorsement would undermine that role. If Brownback supports Giuliani, he "can still support pro-life legislation," O'Steen said. Despite his remarks, O'Steen said he could not see NRLC endorsing Giuliani for president. A senior campaign aide to Brownback said that Brownback meant "nothing more and nothing less" when he offered to meet with all of the Republican presidential candidates (The Hill, 10/30).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/87202.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/87202.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
The Lesser Of Two Evils, ...
posted by the Rev. Dr. Jos. E. Hebert on 6 Nov 2007 at 4:57 amRegarding the NRLC defending Senator Brownback, ...
No one who is "comfortable" with tolerating the murder of innocent children is truly pro-life. Such accomodation is possible only if one's position is based on expedience and compromise rather than conviction. While Governor Romney's convictions are indeed suspect, at least I can hope that time will prove them true. Senator Brownback's, on the other hand, are now known.
But more surprising than a politician triangulating his position, in a transparently obvious attempt to garner maximum political benefit, is the NRLC endorsing such action (even if only indirectly).
It is at best a fleeting bargain, and more often than not outright delusion, to try suring one's position with wavering members. Instead of pandering to such politicians for fear that we may lose the next vote, we need them to fear (read as "respect") us, that they may lose theirs.
Or maybe such compromises are already deeply rooted into the organizational infrastructure of the NRLC. If so, then the NRLC needs to clean house. Otherwise it needs to get used to kneeling at the feet of such politicians, begging for scraps from their tables. And perhaps the most important thing the NRLC should do, before they seek to accomodate such compromise in the future, is learn the hard lesson that, ...
The lesser of two evils is evil too.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




