Why Male Circumcision Is A Biomedical Imperative For The 21st Century, Australia

Main Category: Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 31 Oct 2007 - 3:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

In the Nov issue of the highly-ranked journal BioEssays Brian Morris, a Professor in the School of Medical Sciences and Bosch Institute at The University of Sydney, Australia, presents a powerful position statement with ramifications for all in society. He claims that circumcision of males represents a surgical "vaccine" against a wide variety of infections, adverse medical conditions and potentially fatal diseases over the lifetime of males, and also protects their sexual partners. He makes clear that in experienced hands, this common, inexpensive procedure is very safe, can be pain-free and can be performed at any age.

The benefits vastly outweigh risks. The enormous public health benefits include protection from urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted HIV, HPV, syphilis and chancroid, penile and prostate cancer, phimosis, thrush, and inflammatory dermatoses. His calculations reveal that 1 in 3 uncircumcised males will, as a result of not being circumcised, suffer a medical condition over their lifetime that will require medical attention, and many will die from some of these. Since most complications during circumcision are on average seen in only 1 in 500, and these are easily and immediately treated, the benefits outweigh the risks by over 100 to 1.

In women circumcision of the male partner provides substantial (over 5-fold) protection from cervical cancer and chlamydia. The latter can result in pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility and ectopic pregnancy, Circumcision has socio-sexual benefits and reduces sexual problems with age. It has no adverse effect on penile sensitivity, function, or sensation during sexual arousal. He describes the evidence that reveals why most women prefer the circumcised penis for appearance, hygiene and sex. The claims of groups opposed to circumcision have become increasingly outrageous and vitriolic in the face to the medical evidence in favour. Moreover, quite surprisingly, some doctors continue to practice 'ignorance-based' or prejudiced-based' medicine' when it comes to circumcision. They need to update. Given the convincing epidemiological evidence and biological support, he advocates routine circumcision and says that it should be highly recommended by all health professionals.

BioEssays 29:1147-1158, 2007. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

http://www.medsci.usyd.edu.au

• Additional
• References
• Citations