No Connection Found Between Vitamin D And Overall Cancer Deaths
Main Category: Cancer / OncologyAlso Included In: Nutrition / Diet; Colorectal Cancer
Article Date: 31 Oct 2007 - 4:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 4 posts |
No relationship was found between vitamin D levels and the overall risk of dying from cancer, according to a study published online October 30 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. However, higher vitamin D levels were associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer death.
Several epidemiological studies have supported the hypothesis that that vitamin D can reduce cancer mortality by decreasing cancer incidence or improving survival. Animal and cell studies suggest that vitamin D may reduce tumor growth and induce cancer cell death. Diet and exposure to sunlight are the major sources of vitamin D.
D. Michal Freedman, Ph.D., of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md., and colleagues analyzed data from the third national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to examine the relationship between levels of circulating vitamin D in the blood and cancer mortality in a group of 16,818 participants aged 17 and older.
After about a decade of follow-up, 536 participants had died of cancer. Cancer mortality was not related to the level of circulating vitamin D for the overall group, nor was it related when the researchers looked at the data by sex, race, or age. But higher levels of vitamin D (80 nmol/L or more) were associated with a 72 percent reduced risk of colorectal cancer mortality, compared with lower levels (less than 50 nmol/L).
"To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the relationship between measured serum vitamin D levels and cancer mortality for selected site and for all sites combined," the authors write.
In an accompanying editorial, Cindy Davis, Ph.D., and Johanna Dwyer, D.Sc. of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md., discuss the complicated relationship between nutrients, like vitamin D, and cancer. They suggest that not enough is known about the benefits and limitations of vitamin D to use it for the prevention of disease or death.
"These findings must be put into the context of total diet and lifestyle. There are many risk factors other than diet for colorectal cancer, and there are many possible dietary risk factors other than vitamin D that have been linked to cancer risk," the editorialists write.
###
Contact:
* Article: National Cancer Institute press office
* Editorial: Anne Thurn, office of dietary supplements, National Institutes of Health
Citations:
* Article: Freedman DM, Looker AC, Chang S-C, Graubard BI. Prospective Study of Serum Vitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1594-1602
* Editorial: Davis CD, Dwyer JT. The "Sunshine Vitamin": Benefits Beyond Bone" J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1563-1565
The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is published by Oxford University Press and is not affiliated with the National Cancer Institute. Visit the Journal online at http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/.
Source: Liz Savage
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/87274.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/87274.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (4)
Fundamentally Flawed Research Presented In Biased Manner.
posted by Edward Hutchinson on 16 Dec 2007 at 11:56 amWhen considering Freedman's research, we should note blood samples were collected from southern areas in the winter months, and from northern areas in the summer months. Vitamin d status varies seasonally by 14% in the South and 100% in the North. Comparing the lowest readings from the South with the highest from the North was bound to produce a biased result.
There appears an element of refusing seeing the obvious difference in those 28 breast cancer deaths. I'm sure if the figures had been reverse they would have been considered significant. Dismissing the excess breast deaths in the low vitamin d status group as insignificant simply does not ring true.
The 72% fewer colon cancer deaths should have been given greater priority in the press release. The very important fact vitamin D status over 80nmol/L results in 72% fewer colon cancer deaths should not have been hidden under the headline "No Connection Found Between Vitamin D And Overall Cancer Deaths"
This fundamentally flawed research was presented in a shamefully biased manner.
Not True
posted by Dr. Gilbert O'Reilly on 16 Dec 2007 at 2:12 pmEdward has chosen to make this up. It is not true about the dates when blood was taken. He is making it up - as is so often the case with wacko sun and sunbed worshppers.
Oh YES It Is True,
posted by Ted Hutchinson on 17 Dec 2007 at 3:04 amSee here http://www.nhs.uk/News/2007/October/Pages/NoevidenceofcancerprotectionfromvitaminD.aspx
Using the blood samples, the researchers measured the candidates levels of 25(OH)D; the substance that is the main form of Vitamin D in the body.
The blood samples were taken at different times of the year depending on which area the participant was from, with collection in southern areas in the winter months, and collection in northern areas in the summer months.
Wacko Sun And Sunbed Worshppers May Be Onto A Good Thing?
posted by Edward Hutchinson on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:59 amI would be amused to hear Dr. Gilbert O'Reilly's take on the research available here
Could ultraviolet B irradiance and vitamin D be associated with lower incidence rates of lung cancer?
http://press.psprings.co.uk/jech/december/69_ch52571.pdf
and his no doubt equally ill informed response to
Prospective Study of Predictors of Vitamin D Status and Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Men
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/7/451
Perhaps the good doctor O'Reilly would benefit from viewing the presentation for Medical Students here from the University of Arizona Integrative Medicine Grand Rounds
Vitamin D Deficiency: the cause of everything?
http://accordent.biocom.arizona.edu/2007/10/04/IMGR20071004/links.htm
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




