Cannabis Reclassifcation Debate Could Distract UK Government From Communicating Risks Of Use
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsArticle Date: 02 Nov 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Debating the merits of reclassification of cannabis in the UK could distract the government from the more important job of effectively communicating the risks of using the drug, say authors of Correspondence in this week's edition of The Lancet.
Louisa Degenhardt, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, and Wayne Hall, University of Queensland, Australia, and colleagues refer to a recently published Lancet Editorial on cannabis use, which draws on increasing strong evidence that the drug has a contributory role in psychosis, and debates the wisdom of the UK government's decision to reclassify the drug from B to C in 2004. They say: "The focus on the association between cannabis use and psychosis is understandable, but it distracts attention from more frequent health problems."
The authors question the apparent implicit assumption that reclassification of cannabis, and consequent more severe penalties, will reduce use. They use Australian policy to demonstrate why this may not work-saying that despite different penalties for use across states and territories, cannabis use changed at similar rates across them all. They say: "This finding strongly suggests that other factors-such as societal attitudes and perceived harms-are more important drivers of consumption than penalties for use."
They conclude: "There is a danger that a debate about the reimposition of criminal penalties will distract the British government from more effective communication with the public about the risks of use - which, along with psychosis, should emphasise the more common health risks. Better research is needed on the effect (or lack thereof) of increased penalties on use and harm. It would be mistaken for the British community to assume that the public health problems arising from cannabis use can be solved by the stroke of a legislative pen."
There are four other pieces of correspondence in this week's Lancet discussing a recently published Lancet study on the association between cannabis and psychosis.
The Lancet
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/87368.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/87368.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Classification And Red Herrings.
posted by Peter O'Loughlin on 4 Nov 2007 at 7:07 amThe re-classifying of cannbais from B-C was motivated by political expediency, rather than the medical evidence available at the time. The hype in respect of re-classifying it is also politcally expedient. What is required is a sustained and widespread campaign, spelling out in explicit detail the damage that cannabis can and does cause.
One of the adverse effects of cannabis is paranoia, a condition that convinces people they are in danger of being attacked, consequenbtly it should come as no surprise that many of those who smoke cannabis, arm themselves as a matter of routine; the weapon of choice is predominatly a knife. We know from the maimings and killings that are becoming more commonplace, that knife crime is a common occurence.
In mounting a highly visible and sustained campaign about the dangers of cannabis, we should also remind those senior police officers, who 'are too busy attending to more serious matters' that regular smokers of cannabis are likely to be carrying weapons. Regardless of Mr. Blunkett's message that the possession of cannabis should not be regarded as an arrestable offence, It is more than likely that if rigorous attention from the police were visited on cannabis users, there would be an in increased chance of discovering concealed weapons, the confiscation of which, together with suitable puinishment for the offender, could make a poitive contribution to saving someone's life.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





