Oncologists Call For Medicare To Reconsider Anemia Drug Restrictions
Main Category: Blood / HematologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP
Article Date: 10 Nov 2007 - 0:00 PDT
The Community Oncology Alliance (COA), representing community cancer centers nationwide, formally requested that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reconsider its decision to restrict the access of senior cancer patients to vital anemia-fighting drugs. Effective July 30, 2007, CMS implemented a National Coverage Determination (NCD) limiting oncologists' use of anemia-fighting drugs, referred to as Erythopoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in Medicare cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Anemia is a common side effect of chemotherapy, and ESAs are used to minimize the need for red blood cell transfusions.
According to Dr. Patrick Cobb, a practicing oncologist from Billings, Montana, and Chairman of the COA Clinical Practices Committee, "What prompted this recent request to CMS to reconsider its decision to restrict ESA use was the release on November 8, 2007 of revised FDA-approved labeling for ESAs." Dr. Cobb added, "Unfortunately, what FDA considers safe and effective ESA use, CMS does not. As a result, our Medicare patients are not receiving the same standard of care as our younger patients."
The ESA labeling revisions include additional warnings related to risks associated with the use of ESAs "when dosed to target a hemoglobin of >= 12 g/dL" and instructs physicians to "use the lowest dose needed to avoid red blood cell transfusions" in order to minimize risk. However, the FDA specifically notes in both the revised label and its accompanying press release dated November 8, 2007 that, "no clinical data is available" to establish the risk of using ESAs when hemoglobin levels are less than 12 g/dL. The CMS NCD, on the other hand, arbitrarily prohibits ESA use when hemoglobin levels are 10 g/dL or higher.
"We use ESAs to reduce the need to give our patients transfusions, so we don't expose them to undue risks," said Dr. Cobb. "ESAs are important drugs, as are all the therapies we use to treat our patients--patient safety is always our primary concern. However, what CMS has done is to actually limit our ability to use ESAs in a way that minimizes transfusions."
In its reconsideration letter to CMS, COA notes, "It is readily apparent the CMS NCD essentially overrules the FDA scientific expertise by deeming ESAs unsafe and ineffective when used in the range of >=10 g/dL and <12 g/dL. Equally distressing is the fact that CMS is using a reimbursement policy to substitute its own clinical judgment, rather than allowing physicians to exercise their own clinical judgment for each individual patient's circumstances, as recommended in the newly revised FDA-approved label." COA further notes, "there is evidence to suggest that initiating ESA treatment at a hemoglobin level >10 g/dL significantly reduces the risk of transfusion."
COA is asking CMS for immediate reconsideration of the portions of the NCD dealing with cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
The Community Oncology Alliance (COA) is a non-profit organization. The mission of COA is to foster and protect the community oncology delivery system in the United States through public policy, advocacy, and education. Eighty-four percent of Americans battling cancer receive high quality, affordable, and accessible cancer care in community oncology clinics close to home. The accessibility of high quality cancer care, coupled with earlier diagnosis and new therapies, has resulted in a decreased cancer mortality rate.
Community Oncology Alliance
http://www.communityoncology.org
Visit our blood / hematology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/88341.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/88341.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
The Overabuse Of Anemia Drugs
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 10 Nov 2007 at 8:19 amThe FDA backed CMS' National Coverage Decision (NCD), which limited use of the drugs because the health risks associated with the use of pharmaceutical EPO (ESAs) for cancer patients include: Promotion of tumor growth in patients with advanced breast, head and neck, lymphoid, and non-small cell lung malignancies in studies adminstered EPO to target a hemoglobin of >12 g/dL, and have not been excluded with lower target hemoglobin levels.
FDA's approved labeling recommends use of the lowest dose necessary to avoid the need for blood transfusions and transfusions are not normally given to patients whose hemoglobin is 10 g/dL or higher. The recommendation in the approved labeling that the hemoglobin not exceed 12 g/dL in cancer patients "is intended as an upper safety limit, not a target for therapy."
Lee Newcomer, with United Health Group, had stated at the 12th annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 44% of patients having blood work-ups indicated they were not anemic. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society, reiterated that Newcomer was right on the spot on this. Few drugs work the way we think and few physicians/scientists take the time to think through what it is they are using them for.
A New York Times article stated that anemia drugs, given by injection, have been heavily advertised, and there is evidence that they have been overused, in part because oncologists can make money by using more of the drug. Lichtenfeld told United Press International, "Probably more than a billion dollars is spent on erythropoietin each year, which makes it one of the most expensive cancer drugs."
According to Dr. John Glaspy, director of UCLA's Outpatient Oncology Clinic, one complicating factor, experts say, is that oncologists make significant revenue buying cancer drugs from manufacturers and charging patients a higher price for receiving the drugs in their offices. That profit motive could influence some doctors' decisions.
The FDA's new boxed warning also clarifies that ESAs should only be used in patients with cancer when treating anemia specifically caused by chemotherapy and not for other causes of anemia. Moreover, it states that ESAs should be discontinued once the patient's chemotherapy course has been completed.
Health care professionals need to consider the risks of increased tumor progression and decreased survival in patients with cancer when prescribing ESAs. ESAs should be used in patients with cancer only when their anemia is due to chemotherapy and only at the lowest dose necessary to avoid the need for blood transfusions.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





