Winter Sun Makes It Difficult To Get Vitamin D Naturally
Main Category: Nutrition / DietAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology; Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 16 Nov 2007 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.54 (13 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.6 (5 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 4 posts |
As the days grow shorter, the sun's warm rays aren't the only thing your body may be missing, warns Creighton University researcher Joan Lappe, Ph.D.
If you live in North American at latitudes above the 37th parallel Omaha is near the 41st parallel - you also may not be getting enough vitamin D, says Lappe, professor of medicine and holder of the Criss/Beirne Endowed Chair in the Creighton School of Nursing.
And that vitamin D is important to your health. In fact, a landmark study by Lappe and other Creighton researchers, published in June in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, showed a direct link between vitamin D and cancer prevention.
Humans can get vitamin D from several sources.
During the summer, the body can convert solar energy into ample amounts of vitamin D with just 10-15 minutes exposure daily to the sun. That's not possible this time of year.
"From October until the end of March, the angle of the sun is such that, in much of North America, no vitamin D is available from that source," Lappe says. "What that means is most of us are deficient in vitamin D this time of year."
While you can get the vitamin from fish oil and a few fortified foods, it's difficult to take in adequate amounts of vitamin D by eating alone. Lappe recommends taking vitamin D3 the same form of the vitamin that humans make from exposure to the sun.
The amount of vitamin D you should take daily is a subject of great debate, Lappe notes.
The U.S. government's recommended daily allowance is 200 IU until age 50, 400 IU for 50-70 year olds, and 600 IU after age 70. However, many medical experts believe those recommendations are way too low.
The Canadian Cancer Society recently recommended that people with light skin take 1,000 IU of the vitamin supplement during fall and winter, while people with darker skin or limited sun exposure take that amount throughout the year.
The society's recommendation coincided with the publication of the Creighton (Cray-ton) research in June. The four-year study involving 1,179 Nebraska women showed that women taking calcium supplements plus 1,100 IU of vitamin D3 daily, experienced a 60 percent decrease in their risk of developing cancer than a placebo group.
"Generally, medical experts consider it safe to take between 1,000 IU and 2,000 IU of vitamin D supplements daily," Lappe says.
Creighton University
2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States
http://www2.creighton.edu
Visit our nutrition / diet section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/88971.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/88971.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (4)
Vitamin D3
posted by Colleen on 16 Nov 2007 at 1:25 pmhttp://www.nih.gov says that anyone over the age of 12 months can safely take 2000 iu's per day (two-thousand). Search " vitamin d fact sheet" and then click on "What are the risks of too much.....". Tell your friends and family!
2000iu/daily May Not Be Sufficient.
posted by Edward Hutchinson on 21 Dec 2007 at 2:59 amRisk Assessment for Vitamin D. http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/85/1/6 sets out the evidence supporting a Safe Upper Limit of 10,000iu/daily/D3
The need for this arises because average Vitamin D status is too low for optimal health in Winter over latitude 40. http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/3/860
Hypovitaminosis D in British adults at age 45 y: nationwide cohort study of dietary and lifestyle predictors sets the scene for the UK but the pattern is similar elsewhere.
Vitamin D in pregnancy: an old problem still to be solved? http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/92/9/740 shows women taking prenatal vitamins give birth to vitamin D insufficient babies and provide breast milk devoid of vitamin D.
With UK white adult average status around 40nmol/l from December to March it is unreaslistic to suggest as the Canadian Cancer Society recently recommended that people with light skin take merely 1,000 IU/daily of the vitamin D3 during fall and winter, while people with darker skin or limited sun exposure take that amount throughout the year.
Each 400iu of vitamin D3 raises status on average 9nmol/l, http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/85/3/649
So with a range of 7-12nmol/l per 400iu/daily/d3 a 1000iu/d will raise status between 20.5nmol/l at worst and 30nmol/l at best.
1000iu/d/D3 cannot and will not will raise status of the average UK white adult current at or below 40nmol/l above 80nmol/l required to achieve the 72% lower colon cancer incidence recently reported or achieve optimal control of calcium uptake and use. I find it difficult to understand why health professionals appear unable to do simple arithmetic?
The Vitamin D requirement in health and disease Robert P. Heaney
http://www.europeansunlight.eu/research/uvradvitd/Heaney%20(2005).pdf
For a more sensible assessment of how much Vitamin D may be needed to raise status to optimal may I suggest readers consider the review presented to Canadian Family Physicians http://www.cfp.ca/cgi/content/full/53/5/841?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=vitamin+d&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT
Where it is stated the oral dose of vitamin D3 to attain and maintain 25(OH)D levels >80 nmol/L is 2200 IU/d if baseline levels are 20 to 40 nmol/L, 1800 IU/d if levels are 40 to 60 nmol/L, and 1160 IU/d if levels are between 60 and 80 nmol/L
The goal we should be striving for is >100 at the lowest and around 125nmol/l normally for lowest overall cancer incidence.
Winter Sun, Vitamin D
posted by LH on 21 Dec 2010 at 10:57 amHas it been proven that from October to May vitamin D from the sun is not possible in most of North America?
I also read that Vitamin D is stored for a month, or it's half life is a month. So you're not deficient all through the winter. That is if you had normal level to begin with.
vit d intake
posted by stevo on 13 Feb 2011 at 10:06 pmthe same question as the previous post LH asked, is it proven that the suns rays are not strong enough to provide vit d through the winter months in saskatchewan for ex.?? In february the sun is pretty warm so i would assume by march the rays should be strong enough is it possible?? This is a very serious health concern and hopefully someone can respond to this post correctly!!!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.







