Editorial, Opinion Piece Discuss Issues Related To Medicare Advantage Plans, Physician Reimbursements
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPAlso Included In: Primary Care / General Practice
Article Date: 22 Nov 2007 - 7:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
An editorial and an opinion piece published recently address issues related to private Medicare Advantage plans and Medicare physician reimbursements. Summaries appear below.
- Des Moines Register: "There is a long list of reasons why" MA plans are "bad for seniors, taxpayers and the Medicare program itself," according to a Register editorial. According to the editorial, Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA plans "might not be able to get treatment at a local hospital or clinic," and the plans "cost taxpayers a bundle." The editorial adds, "Perhaps the worst thing about private plans is they siphon people into the private sector," which is a "step toward dismantling a public health insurance program that has worked well for more than 40 years." In response, "Congress should eliminate subsidies to private insurers" because MA plans "confuse consumers, increase administrative costs and waste tax dollars," the editorial states, adding, "It makes us wonder who -- except for the insurers receiving government subsidies -- receives any advantage from these plans" (Des Moines Register, 11/21).
- Ronald Davis and William Novelli, South Florida Sun-Sentinel: The "future for Medicare patients' access to care is bleak unless we take concrete steps" to reverse a scheduled reduction in physician reimbursements, Davis, president of the American Medical Association, and Novelli, CEO of AARP, write in a Sun-Sentinel opinion piece. According to the authors, Congress should pass legislation to equalize reimbursements between MA plans and traditional Medicare because the savings that would result would "make it possible ... to stop cuts to doctors who care for Medicare patients and to add important new benefits like more preventive care and help for low-income Medicare patients -- all without raising Medicare premiums even higher." Congress "has a choice: Keep its long-term commitment to keep Medicare strong for Americans -- or keep over-subsidizing big insurance," the authors write, adding, "Seems like an easy choice to us" (Davis/Novelli, South Florida Sun-Sentinel, 11/20).
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/89549.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/89549.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





