Senator Criticizes Limits On Sales Of Genentech's Avastin
Main Category: Eye Health / BlindnessAlso Included In: Seniors / Aging; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 30 Nov 2007 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
Genentech's plan to limit the availability of cancer drug Avastin, which would require physicians to use a more expensive version of the drug called Lucentis to treat wet age-related macular degeneration, will cost taxpayers $1 billion to $3 billion annually, according to Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), Bloomberg/New York Times reports (Bloomberg/New York Times, 11/29). Genentech officials are considering a plan under which wholesalers no longer would distribute Avastin to compounding pharmacies, which divide vials of the medication into small portions for use in the eye. Genentech also manufactures the similar drug Lucentis, which FDA last year approved as a treatment for the eye disease, the most common cause of blindness in the elderly. Both Avastin and Lucentis block the growth of blood vessels. Lucentis costs $1,950 per dose, about 100 times more than the cost of the dose of Avastin required to treat the eye disease.
In letters to CMS and FDA that were made public on Wednesday, Kohl wrote the company's decision "is of great concern to me." Kohl also wrote a letter to Genentech informing them of a future investigation by his staff of the Avastin restrictions. In a statement, Genentech said, "The request is a voluntary request for information," adding, "Genentech intends to cooperate with Sen. Kohl's request for information and work closely with committee staff to answer their questions."
According to the Contra Costa Times, some have requested that Genentech conduct a study comparing the two drugs, but it has no plans to do so. Company spokesperson Krysta Pellegrino said, "For Genentech, we think our resources would be better spent to continue to do research in unmet patient needs." She added, "We believe that we've already shown that Lucentis is the right treatment for this eye disease" (Morrill, Contra Costa Times, 11/29). The National Eye Institute is financing a two-year study comparing the effectiveness of the two treatments (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 10/6/06).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our eye health / blindness section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/90321.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/90321.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





