Risk Stratification Of Men With Gleason Score 7 To 10 Tumors By Primary And Secondary Gleason Score: Results From The SEARCH Database

Main Category: Urology / Nephrology
Also Included In: Cancer / Oncology;  Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 02 Dec 2007 - 0:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

4.67 (3 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


UroToday.com- In the August issue of Urology, Dr. Kang and associates from the SEARCH database report that Gleason score 7(4+3) CaP has a similar risk profile to Gleason (4+4). A Gleason cohort of 374 men was studied and included men with a Gleason score of 3+4, 4+3, or 4+4 or more. Clinical, pathologic, and biochemical outcomes were assessed in univariate and microvariate analysis.

A biopsy Gleason score of 4+3 was associated with higher risk disease than was 3+4 as noted by higher pathologic grade and more extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI). No significant differences were identified between Gleason score 4+3 and 4+4 or more in any clinicopathologic characteristic other than for higher grade pathologic tumors in the 4+4 cohort. While Gleason score 4+3 had increased odds of ECE and SVI, the 4+3 group did not differ in ECE, SVI, or positive surgical margins from the 4+4 cohort. During the follow-up period 37% experienced biochemical progression and Gleason score 4+3 were associated with an increased risk of progression relative to 3+4 but it was similar to 4+4. Furthermore, men with an RP Gleason score of 4+3 had an increased risk of progression relative to an RP Gleason score of 3+4, but it was similar to those with an RP score of 4+4. These data suggest that men with a biopsy Gleason score 4+3 should be counseled similar to those with a Gleason score 4+4, due to the risk of adverse pathologic outcomes and tumor progression.

Kang DE, Fitzsimons NJ, Presti JC, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Amling CL, Freedland SJ, SEARCH Database Study Group

Urol. 70(2): 277- 282, August 2007
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.059

Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, M.D

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.

To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com

----------------------------
Copyright © 2007 - UroToday
Reproduced for Medical News Today with permission of UroToday.
----------------------------

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Urology Today. "Risk Stratification Of Men With Gleason Score 7 To 10 Tumors By Primary And Secondary Gleason Score: Results From The SEARCH Database." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 2 Dec. 2007. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/90399.php>

APA
Urology Today. (2007, December 2). "Risk Stratification Of Men With Gleason Score 7 To 10 Tumors By Primary And Secondary Gleason Score: Results From The SEARCH Database." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/90399.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Urology / Nephrology

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Urology News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Urology / Nephrology Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »