Is There A Developmental Component To The Risk For Depression?
Main Category: Psychology / PsychiatryAlso Included In: Depression; Anxiety / Stress; Mental Health
Article Date: 11 Dec 2007 - 4:00 PDT
Psychiatrists remain divided as to how to define and classify the mood and anxiety disorders, the most common mental disorders. Committees across the globe are currently pondering how best to carve nature at its anxious joints for the fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-V), the "gold standard" reference book for psychiatrists. Only recently has the process of refining the diagnostic system been informed by high quality longitudinal data. An important new study of this type was published in the December 1st issue of Biological Psychiatry.
Ian Colman, Ph.D., the lead author, notes, ""Rarely have classification systems in psychiatry considered the nature of symptoms of depression and anxiety over time; however research into trajectories of alcohol abuse and antisocial behaviour shows that accounting for symptoms over time may help in better understanding causes and outcomes of these disorders." Colman and colleagues at the University of Cambridge in England and the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (now called the MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing), using fundamental ideas about the life-course origins of common mental illnesses, statistical techniques for handling large quantities of longitudinal information and one of the longest running cohort studies in the world, were able to analyze data by grouping people according to their symptoms of anxiety and depression over a 40-year period.
The researchers were able to identify six courses of mental health, ranging from those with repeated severe symptoms to those in good mental health, while others fluctuated in between. Dr. Colman adds, "The usefulness of characterizing people by their experience over time became evident when we investigated markers of early development, and found that those with poorer mental health over time were more likely to be smaller at birth and tended to reach developmental milestones later than those with good mental health."
John H. Krystal, M.D., Editor of Biological Psychiatry and affiliated with both Yale University School of Medicine and the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, comments, "The study by Colman and colleagues suggests that children with low weight during infancy or slight developmental delays may be at greater risk for developing depression. How does this risk work" After all, it is extremely unlikely that adults bear emotional scars from very subtle delays in their standing or walking." The authors explain that their findings support a proposed "fetal programming" model for depression and anxiety, which posits that prenatal stress may result in permanent maladaptive changes to the developing fetal brain. Particularly notable was the fact that differences with regards to early development were apparent not only for those with severe problems with mental health, but also for those with mild to moderate symptoms of depression and anxiety over time. Dr. Krystal adds that it may also be "that genes that are involved in shaping the development of the brain and the emergence of particular behaviors during infancy also influence the development of brain circuits that influence the risk for depression later in life."
###
The article is "A Longitudinal Typology of Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Over the Life Course" by Ian Colman, George B. Ploubidis, Michael E.J. Wadsworth, Peter B. Jones and Tim J. Croudace. Drs. Colman, Ploubidis, Jones, and Croudace are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Dr. Wadsworth is with the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School in London, United Kingdom. The article appears in Biological Psychiatry, Volume 62, Issue 11 (December 1, 2007), published by Elsevier.
About Biological Psychiatry
This international rapid-publication journal is the official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry. It covers a broad range of topics in psychiatric neuroscience and therapeutics. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and treatment of major neuropsychiatric disorders. Full-length and Brief Reports of novel results, Commentaries, Case Studies of unusual significance, and Correspondence and Comments judged to be of high impact to the field are published, particularly those addressing genetic and environmental risk factors, neural circuitry and neurochemistry, and important new therapeutic approaches. Concise Reviews and Editorials that focus on topics of current research and interest are also published rapidly.
Biological Psychiatry is ranked 4th out of the 95 Psychiatry titles and 16th out of 199 Neurosciences titles on the 2006 ISI Journal Citations Reports® published by Thomson Scientific.
About Elsevier
Elsevier is a world-leading publisher of scientific, technical and medical information products and services. Working in partnership with the global science and health communities, Elsevier's 7,000 employees in over 70 offices worldwide publish more than 2,000 journals and 1,900 new books per year, in addition to offering a suite of innovative electronic products, such as ScienceDirect (http://www.sciencedirect.com/), MD Consult (http://www.mdconsult.com/), Scopus (http://www.info.scopus.com/), bibliographic databases, and online reference works. Elsevier (http://www.elsevier.com/) is a global business headquartered in Amsterdam, The Netherlands and has offices worldwide.
Elsevier is part of Reed Elsevier Group plc (http://www.reedelsevier.com/), a world-leading publisher and information provider. Operating in the science and medical, legal, education and business-to-business sectors, Reed Elsevier provides high-quality and flexible information solutions to users, with increasing emphasis on the Internet as a means of delivery. Reed Elsevier's ticker symbols are REN (Euronext Amsterdam), REL (London Stock Exchange), RUK and ENL (New York Stock Exchange).
Source: Jayne Dawkins
Elsevier
Visit our psychology / psychiatry section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/91404.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/91404.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Developmental Component/Depression Risk
posted by Anon56 on 12 Dec 2007 at 7:18 amI wish that I could say that I find it amusing or ironic that psychiatrists are debating and ruminating on how to re-define and re-classify the most common mental disorders.
However, I find it absolutely horrifying and frightening on several different levels. I am a person with the brain diseases of addiction, depression, and probably some undiagnosed personality disorders. I come from a large family and just through my personal observations of siblings and parents, and through oral history of ancestral family members, these same diseases are rampant among my biological family members.
I have a non-biological daughter who has shown signs of a brain disease since birth which has become progressively worse. Over the course of my physical adult life, I have probably seen 12 to 15 psychiatrists and probably half as many psychologists/therapists. Out of all of those psychiatrists, I have found only one who actually took the time to listen and have a dialog with me as opposed to merely "medication management". He is my current (and hopefully permanent, God willing he should live a long life) doctor.
Almost every therapist I have ever worked with (the majority women) have helped me as much as I was willing and capable of being and accepting help. I feel the same about my current therapist as I do my current psychiatrist.
My 13-year old daughter has had 13 different psychiatrists in 2 years; 5 therapists. Out of the 13 psychiatrists, 2 bothered to read her medical, social, environmental, emotional, family, and educational history (all of which I gathered, organized in chronological order from in utero to current, and gave to them in multiple copies and verbally briefed them multiple times); only 1 read her file and included her parents, siblings and therapist as part of a treatment team; the rest billed themselves as "just medication management" and at least one informed me that the word "gestalt" was the name of the guy who invented a neuro-psych test.
So, I certainly hope that the psychiatrists who are revising the DSM get some input from the people who have these diseases and are more informed, educated, open-minded, and less ego-driven than the psychiatrists who are out here purportedly treating human beings with these diseases.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





