Republican Presidential Candidates Discuss Health Care, Other Issues During Last Debate In Iowa
Main Category: Public HealthAlso Included In: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP; Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 14 Dec 2007 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 3 posts |
Nine Republican presidential candidates on Wednesday during a debate in Iowa sponsored by the Des Moines Register and Iowa Public Television discussed health care and other issues, the AP/Kansas City Star reports.
During the debate, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that he would reduce federal spending for health care and other domestic programs by as much as 15% (AP/Kansas City Star, 12/13). Giuliani also said that he would seek to provide U.S. residents with more "ownership" of their health care, "rather than relying on government as the nanny government." He added, "Let's rely on people to make choices about their health care. That's an American solution" (Helman, Boston Globe, 12/13).
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee cited the need to focus on preventive health care (Cooper/Luo, New York Times, 12/13).
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said that health care costs are "going through the roof" and that "we need to reduce the burden on middle-income families in this country."
Former Sen. Fred Thompson (Tenn.) said that as president he would seek to reduce the cost of Medicare. He said that "we've got to look at ... Medicare and do some things now that won't hurt anybody badly but will save it for the next generation" (Associated Press, 12/12). In addition, he said that he would eliminate Medicare eligibility for seniors with the highest income levels (Thomma, Miami Herald, 12/12).
Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), Rep. Duncan Hunter (Calif.), former Ambassador Alan Keyes, Rep. Ron Paul (Texas) and Rep. Tom Tancredo (Colo.) also participated in the debate (Associated Press, 12/12). The debate, moderated by Register editor Carolyn Washburn, marked the last forum that will feature all of the Republican candidates before the Iowa caucuses next month (Kiely, USA Today, 12/13).
Romney Promises To Address Health Care Within Four Years
Romney on Tuesday at a house party in Johnston, Iowa, said that as president he would expand health insurance to all U.S. residents within four years. According to "The Trail," Romney "bragged that more than two-thirds of the uninsured" in Massachusetts, where in 2006 he signed a law that requires all residents to obtain health insurance, "are now covered." He said, "I'll battle to get that done in every state in the country."
In addition, the Romney campaign has begun to distribute a new mailer in Iowa that depicts him as the candidate most able to expand health insurance to all residents. The mailer, titled "Promises, Promises," says that "everyday in Iowa, presidential candidates make promises to expand health care coverage," adding that, "as governor, Mitt Romney created the first comprehensive health care reform program in the country" (Bacon, "The Trail," Washington Post, 12/12).
Editorial Examines Romney Record
"During his presidential run, Mr. Romney continues to move sharply to the right" on health care and other issues, according to a Washington Times editorial.
For example, as governor of Massachusetts, Romney signed a health insurance law that "includes a mixture of big government mandates" and a "heavily subsidized premium assistance program," the editorial states. However, the editorial states, the law also includes a "number of critical market reforms, which include permitting HMOs to offer high-deductible plans tied to health savings accounts."
According to the editorial, based on his past record, his "major challenge in the coming weeks will be persuading more conservatives that he is the most plausible Republican nominee" (Washington Times, 12/13).
Commentary
American Public Media's "Marketplace" on Wednesday included a commentary by Robert Reich, a secretary of labor under former President Clinton, about the health care proposals of Democratic presidential candidates. According to Reich, the candidates agree on most issues related to health care reform but continue "squabbling" over whether to require individuals to obtain health insurance.
He concludes that, to implement health care reform, "Democrats need to start building a movement in support of the big and important reforms universal health insurance requires -- on which Democrats happen to agree" (Reich, "Marketplace," American Public Media," 12/12).
Audio and a transcript of the segment are available online.
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/91768.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/91768.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (3)
The Gutless And The Sanguine
posted by Bronco Billy on 15 Dec 2007 at 3:51 pmIt's burdensome to once again realize that (apparently) nobody running for president really understands health care delivery, particularly the fractured and (dismally ironic) expensive system we have in the U.S.
The Republican bobbleheads in particular need to be exposed for saying nothing but the most trite and meaningless crap.
As if to one-up one of his previous caricatures of himself, Giuliani claims (naturally without any specifics) that he'll reduce health care costs overall by 15%. Just wipe those dollars from the budget, I imagine, which is Bush's and the rest of the Republicans' answer to bringing down health care costs. Sounds like he's on the Health Savings Account bandwagon, again like his dopey twin,GWB.
Huckabee will get everyone eating right and exercising, which will pretty much take care of things, since nobody will be sick then, or born with something or have an accident.
Thompson pulls crap right out of the old lobbyist's hat, wanting to be sure "no one gets hurt too badly", but, you know, tuff choices 'n' stuff, we (the well-off, the movie stars) can't be paying for all these semi-ambulatory, quasi-indigent and basically defenseless geezers.
Who knows what Romney has in mind, probably another version of forcing people to get coverage, not so much worrying about the fact that many, many of them (still) can't afford the premiums (and co-pays, deductibles, etc.).
That pretty much covers the Sanguine.
What is really, really wrong with just having a single payer solution and telling all the hands-in-the-pie participants that their innovation and services are always welcome and market if you must, but the Payer (the American public) is now the dog and the marketers are the tail? Lots of people wiser than I have asked that question and concluded that nothing is wrong with that idea.
Others, particularly those indentured to lobbyists, insurance companies and other power brokers, when asked the same question always have the same answer (in some variation): Man, that's socialized medicine. It's a stupid reply that they can't back up if questioned directly by anyone with half a clue.
And that pretty much covers the Gutless.
America Has Really Slipped
posted by Robert Morris on 16 Dec 2007 at 1:48 pmOver the last few years, as I read about how the USA is today, I feel really sorry for Americans. In the 50s and 60s it was lightyears ahead of the rest of the world. Nowadays, with a rundown and expensive inept health service, low life expectancy, incredibly limited public transport infrastructure, runaway pollution per head of the population, a currency that is becoming more and more fragile by the day, a crumbling public health education system (I read that in some schools they have to walk through a metal detector) - I am glad I decided to remain in England twenty years ago when a job opportunity in New Orleans was offered to me.
I saw the movie Sicko yesterday and was completely shocked that in America hospitals can actually turn people away, if if that means their eventual death. Whatever happened to the American dream?
Rebuttal To Bronco Billy's Bull
posted by Tom on 29 Jan 2008 at 10:54 amAs for the Democrats witness their wonderful infighting and do-nothing congress comprised of Nancy Pelosi and Wacko Harry Reid. their solution is to create another mind numbing rotting federal system. Lets stuff taxpayer money into the hole in the dike to fix it... then theres Hillary....
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






