Lack Of Sunlight May Increase Lung Cancer Risk
Main Category: Lung CancerAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 17 Dec 2007 - 17:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.57 (7 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Lack of sunlight may increase the risk of lung cancer, suggests a study of rates of the disease in over 100 countries, published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
Lung cancer kills over a million people every year around the globe.
The researchers looked at the association between latitude, exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) light, and rates of lung cancer according to age in 111 countries across several continents.
They took account of the amount of cloud cover and aerosol use, both of which absorb UVB light, and cigarette smoking, the primary cause of lung cancer
International databases, including those of the World Health Organization, and national health statistics were used.
Smoking was most strongly associated with lung cancer rates, accounting for between 75% and 85% of the cases.
But exposure to sunlight, especially UVB light, the principal source of vitamin D for the body, also seemed to have an impact, the findings showed.
The amount of UVB light increases with proximity to the equator. And the analyses showed that lung cancer rates were highest in those countries furthest away from the equator and lowest in those nearest.
Higher cloud cover and airborne aerosol levels were also associated with higher rates of the disease.
In men, the prevalence of smoking was associated with higher lung cancer rates, while greater exposure to UVB light was associated with lower rates.
Among women, cigarette smoking, total cloud cover, and airborne aerosols were associated with higher rates of lung cancer, while greater exposure to UVB light was associated with lower rates.
The associations for a protective role for UVB light persisted after adjusting for smoking.
The link between cancer and sunlight is chemically plausible, say the authors, because laboratory research has shown that vitamin D can halt tumour growth by promoting the factors responsible for cell death in the body.
"Although cigarette smoking is the main cause of lung cancer, greater UVB exposure may reduce the incidence of the disease," they conclude.
Could ultraviolet B irradiance and vitamin D be associated with lower incidence rates of lung cancer?
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007; 62: 69-74]
Visit our lung cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/91989.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/91989.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Don't Forget...
posted by Sam H on 17 Dec 2007 at 7:30 pmSometimes we are guilty of reading a new discovery and thinking its the greatest thing in the world without remembering other outside factors. My post serves to remind you that there is also a correlation between SKIN cancer and UV radiation. And therein lies a paradox: sunlight prevents cancer and sunlight causes cancer. As one problem is solved another appears...
Sun Avoidance Increases More Cancers And Kills More People Than Sensible Sun Exposure.
posted by Edward Hutchinson on 20 Dec 2007 at 2:49 amThe full text of the paper "Could ultraviolet B irradiance and vitamin D be
associated with lower incidence rates of lung
cancer?" is available online here http://press.psprings.co.uk/jech/december/69_ch52571.pdf
I do hope everyone reading this post takes the time to read it carefully or at the very least, looks at the plots of lung cancer incidence in relation to latitude.
Those people who have already read Ed Giovannucci's paper "Prospective Study of Predictors of Vitamin D Status and Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Men" also available on line http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/98/7/451
will be aware they found a 20% lower incidence of lung cancer per 25 nmol increase in the estimated serum 25(OH)D level. Please bear that in mind as you consider the incidence increase per 10 degrees latitude, it makes a lot of sense.
The recent fundamentally flawed Freedman study shows a 72% reduction in colon cancer incidence over 80nmol/l .
Similar work on breast and prostate cancers also show similar trends for higher vitamin d status being inversely associated with cancer incidence and progression. In total there are 19 different cancers for which similar plots of UVB reducing agents such as latitude/cloud-cover/aerosol pollution may provide similar patterns of distribution.
The claim that for each skin cancer death attributable to excessive sun exposure there are 60 other cancer deaths caused by too little sun exposure and too low a Vitamin D3 status is totally justifiable.
I could also detail the evidence for the impact of low vitamin d status on · Type 1 and 2 diabetes · Multiple sclerosis · Rheumatoid arthritis · Osteoarthritis · Periodontal disease · Increased susceptibility to infection · Osteoporosis · Low birth weight infants · Low seizure threshold
· 19 different Cancers· Non-Hodgkin 's lymphoma · Hypertension
· Myocardial infarction · Stroke, · CHF · Wheezing in childhood · Falls in the elderly · Muscle strength in the elderly but I think that may take this post somewhat off topic.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




