New Study Confirms Benefits Of Hospitalist Care
Main Category: Public HealthAlso Included In: Primary Care / General Practice; Medical Students / Training
Article Date: 20 Dec 2007 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.5 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
In the largest study to date evaluating the outcome of in-hospital care by various physician types, findings show that care by hospitalists resulted in shorter stays and lower costs to patients.
Study results are reported in the Dec. 20, 2007 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Findings show that compared to general internists, patients cared for by hospitalists had a length of stay shortened by 12 percent, or nearly half a day, and modestly lower costs. The two groups exhibited similar mortality and hospital readmission rates. When compared to family physicians, patients overseen by hospitalists also stayed in the hospital almost half a day less. Treatment cost, mortality and readmission rates were similar.
Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco and Tufts University led the study team.
The study is based on data from 45 hospitals across the country that participate in Perspective, a national database used for hospital quality and utilization benchmarking. Researchers gathered information including patient mortality, readmission, length-of-stay and cost of treatment. Using these criteria, they compared the outcome of 76, 926 patients under the care of hospitalists, general internists and family physicians across seven common inpatient conditions: heart failure, pneumonia, stroke, chronic obstructive coronary disease, chest pain, heart attack and urinary tract infection.
Hospitalist medicine is one of the fastest growing specialties in medicine, the researchers said, yet little evidence existed to support the benefit of hospitalist care before this study.
"Even though the differences in the length of stay may seem small, when multiplied by the thousands of admissions that hospitalists see each year, the effects can be quite large," said Peter Lindenauer, MD, MSc, lead author of the study and associate professor of medicine at Baystate Medical Center and the Tufts University School of Medicine.
"A .4 day shorter length-of-stay per case multiplied by 5,000 cases annually will save 2,000 bed days and enable 500 more patients to be cared for each year without increasing the number of hospital beds. Moreover, there aren't many interventions capable of achieving these kinds of efficiency gains," he added.
Researchers noted that the benefit to hospitals of more efficient patient traffic can be used to justify the cost of training programs.
"It appears clear that the benefits of hospitalist care really exist, so we can now turn our attention to moving the field of hospital medicine forward. Research into hospitalists is just one manifestation of research into better ways to structure programs," said Andrew Auerbach, MD, MPH, senior author on the study and associate professor of medicine at UCSF. "The important thing from here is that hospital medicine capitalizes on opportunities to further innovate hospital services to maximize effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of healthcare."
In an accompanying editorial in NEJM, Laurence F. McMahon, Jr., MD, MPH, from the Department of Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy at the University of Michigan, identifies hospitalists as an integral part of hospital care and the study as definitive evidence of the benefit they provide. He suggests that hospitalists as well as academic and policy leaders turn their focus to addressing the looming shortage of hospitalists and other generalists by addressing payment reform, and by increasing the role of hospitalists in academic medical centers, through the establishment of strong fellowship programs in hospital medicine.
"Instead of comparison studies, new investigations should focus on quality improvement, comparative effectiveness, clinical informatics, the safety of patients and the translation of new medical advances to clinical practice," McMahon said.
###
The study was supported by a patient safety research and training grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and by a Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award.
Co-authors on the study include Michael B. Rothberg, MD, MPH, and Evan M. Benjamin, MD, both of Baystate Medical Center and the Tufts University School of Medicine; Penelope S. Pekow, PhD, Baystate Medical Center and the University of Massachusetts-Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences; and Christopher Kenwood, University of Massachusetts-Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences.
UCSF is a leading university dedicated to defining health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care.
Source: Lauren Hammit
University of California - San Francisco
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/92393.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/92393.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Hospitalist Vs. Primary Care Md
posted by Nancy on 26 Dec 2007 at 8:51 amAfter a recent stay in the hospital after a back surgery I was treated by a different hospitalist everyday. Each had their own opinion about what was going wrong. I ended up having a very serious infection. I strongly felt that I would have been better cared for and attended to had my own personal physician been ooking after me.
He told me prior to my surgery that as a family physician his practice no longer makes rounds to the hospital. I have since changed to an internal medicine physician who does see his patients when they are ill in the hospital. I felt that seeing the physician who knows all about my health history is better than seeing the "different Doctor" everyday plan. During my stay in the hospital I ended up staying longer because they were waiting for the results of the myriad of tests they had ordered. Not one of them ever bothered to look at my infected incision. It may be cheaper for hospitals to have hospitalists on hand, but is it really benefitting the patient?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






