Understanding Why We Don't Get Cancer All The Time
Main Category: Biology / BiochemistryAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 22 Dec 2007 - 10:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The seemingly inefficient way our bodies replace worn-out cells is a defense against cancer, according to new research.
Having the neighboring cell just split into two identical daughter cells would seem to be the simplest way to keep bodies from falling apart.
However that would be a recipe for uncontrolled growth, said John W. Pepper of The University of Arizona in Tucson.
"If there were only one cell type in the group, it would act like an evolving population of cells. Individual cells would get better and better at surviving and reproducing," said Pepper, a UA assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and a member of UA's BIO5 Institute.
"When cells reach the point where they divide constantly, instead of only when needed, they are cancer cells."
Instead, multicellular organisms use a seemingly inefficient process to replace lost cells, Pepper said. An organ such as the skin calls upon skin-specific stem cells to produce intermediate cells that in turn produce skin cells.
Although great at their job, the new skin cells are evolutionary dead ends. The cells cannot reproduce.
Losing the ability to reproduce was part of the evolutionary path single-celled organisms had to take to become multicellular, Pepper said.
What was in it for the single cells?
"Probably they got to be part of something more powerful," Pepper said. "Something that was hard to eat and good at eating other things."
Pepper and his colleagues published their paper, "Animal Cell Differentiation Patterns Suppress Somatic Evolution," in the current issue of PLoS Computational Biology. Pepper's co-authors are Kathleen Sprouffske of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia and Carlo C. Maley of the Wistar Institute.
The National Institutes of Health, the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Pew Charitable Trust and the Santa Fe Institute funded the research.
Pepper became curious about the origins of cooperation between cells while he was a postdoctoral fellow at the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico.
"Organisms are just a bunch of cells," he said.
"If you understand the conditions under which they cooperate, you can understand the conditions under which cooperation breaks down. Cancer is a breakdown of cooperation."
Pepper and his colleagues used a kind of computer model called an agent-based model to compare different modes of cellular reproduction.
The results indicate that if cells reproduce by simply making carbon-copies of themselves, the cells' descendants are more likely to accumulate mutations.
In contrast, if cellular reproduction was much more complicated, the cells' descendants had fewer mutations.
Suppressing mutations that might fuel uncontrolled growth of cells would be particularly important for larger organisms that had long lives, the team wrote in their research report.
###
Related Web sites:
http://eebweb.arizona.edu/Faculty/Bios/pepper.html
http://www.santafe.edu/profiles/?pid=110
Source: Mari N. Jensen
University of Arizona
Visit our biology / biochemistry section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/92404.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/92404.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Respiratory Impairment Is Prime Cause Of Cancer
posted by Winfield J. Abbe on 25 Dec 2007 at 9:18 amObviously these authors have not read any of the seminal papers by the genius level scientist Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. (1883-1970) in Germany but confirmed by scientists around the world. Oxygen is the energy supply for all living cells except those very primitive ones which run on glucose without oxygen, fermentation.
Dr. Warburg invented the tissue slice technique. He also invented a special device to measure the intercellular oxygen pressure. His early experiments, before 1923, were on animals. He observed what happened when the intercellular oxygen pressure was reduced and found that when it was reduced by about one third, the tissue became cancerous and began running mainly on sugar.
The transformation happens quite quickly for animal tissue, but takes decades for human tissue. It took about 40+ more years to prove this for human tissue by about 1955-1969. Dr. Warburg was even nominated for the first "cancer" Nobel prize in 1926 for this seminal work and it was published in a compendium of other laboratories in 1930 "The Metabolism of Tumous". A recent book "The Hidden Story of Cancer by Brian Peskin, E.E. and Amid Habib, M.D. reviews the subject and has a whole chapter demolishing the myth of the cancer generals that cancer is caused by gene mutations. Isn't it too bad some "scientists" are so prejudiced and ignorant they won't read the experiments and facts developed by geniuses like Dr. Warburg rather than blindly acceping the false, unproved speculations and "hope" of the medical orthodoxy of the U.S. which has been lying and misrepresenting and falsifying the work of Otto Warburg for decades?
Other references:
'The Truth Abour Hydrazine Sulfate" by Joseph Gold, M.D., 2005, http://www.hydrazinesulfate.org.
"The Cancer Industry" by Ralph W. Moss, PH.D., Eqinox Press, N.Y., 1996, first published about 1980 as "The Cancer Syndrome".
"Cancer and the Selective Search for Biochemical Inhibitors" by E.J. Hoffman, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2007
It is the fermentation (proved by experiments and facts by Dr. Warburg) which causes the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells, just like all fermentation organisms, or the wrong energy supply. As Dr. Warburg elucidated, only oxygen energy is capable of cell differentiation.
Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



