Comparative Results Of Shockwave Lithotripsy For Renal Calculi In Upper, Middle, And Lower Calices

Main Category: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 30 Dec 2007 - 1:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:4 stars

4 (1 votes)


UroToday.com- Using a Dornier MPL 9000, the authors provide a very thorough evaluation of treatments among 118 patients with solitary calyceal stones. Stone free was defined as < 3 mm on an intravenous urogram at 3 months. There is not much new here but it reinforces earlier works with the following observations:

a. Lower calyceal stones clear poorer than middle or upper calyceal calculi: 83%, 83%, and 68%. Of particular importance is that while these numbers look "good" at first glance, the efficiency quotients (i.e. % of stones requiring a single treatment without the attendant need for either retreatment or an auxiliary procedure) tell another story: 50%, 45%, and 33% respectively.

b. While calculi up to 2 cm can be treated, the success rate is less than for stones in the 1 cm or less range: 91% vs. 66% with an attendant increase in the mean number of treatment sessions from 1.9 to 2.4 (i.e. read: diminishing returns).

c. In this study, lower pole infundibular length and width were statistically significantly related to treatment success. However, this remains an ongoing controversial point of diminishing relevance given the demise of intravenous urography in the United States.

In sum, shock wave lithotripsy in 2007, in my opinion, likely is best reserved for those calculi up to 1 cm in size, with those stones larger than 2 cm being relegated to percutaneous procedures. For the stones in between 1-2 cm other factors such as location, density on CT scan, and the skin to stone distance should be considered in the decision making process for shock wave lithotripsy vs. ureteroscopy vs. percutaneous stone removal.

Turna B, Ekren F, Nazli O, Akbay K, Altay B, Ozyurt C, Cikill N

J Endourol. 21(9):951-956, September 2007
doi:10.1089/end.2007.0275.

Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Ralph V. Clayman, M.D

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.

To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com

----------------------------
Copyright © 2007 - UroToday
Reproduced for Medical News Today with permission of UroToday.
----------------------------

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Urology Today. "Comparative Results Of Shockwave Lithotripsy For Renal Calculi In Upper, Middle, And Lower Calices." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Dec. 2007. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/92783.php>

APA
Urology Today. (2007, December 30). "Comparative Results Of Shockwave Lithotripsy For Renal Calculi In Upper, Middle, And Lower Calices." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/92783.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Urology / Nephrology

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Urology News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Urology / Nephrology Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »