Tracking Down Allergenic Substances
Main Category: AllergyAlso Included In: Biology / Biochemistry; Immune System / Vaccines; Public Health
Article Date: 06 Jan 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.56 (9 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
At present, animal tests are the only way of determining whether a particular chemical can cause an allergic reaction. Researchers working on the Sens-it-iv project are developing alternative methods that can reliably predict the allergy risk of chemicals without animal testing.
There is danger lurking everywhere in textiles, cosmetics, medicines, detergents, foodstuffs, toys, and even at work. Potentially allergenic substances surround us all the time. The dramatic increase in allergy-related diseases makes it increasingly important to take preventive action. Two years ago, the EU issued a new directive requiring all chemicals to be reassessed with respect to toxic risk. One very important question is "Which substances can lead to sensitization and from there to the development of allergies?"
In the past, tests had to be performed on animals in order to answer such questions. Scientists at the Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM in Hannover are currently engaged in work for the EU Sens-it-iv project to develop alternative methods that will one day eliminate the need for animal testing. "We have focused our attention on substances that are absorbed by the body via the lungs, i.e. by inhalation," says project manager Dr. Armin Braun. "We do not administer chemical substances to live animals to test for allergy risk; instead we use specimens of lung tissue." This tissue is generally obtained from rodents, and cut into very fine slices using a special, highly precise method. The chemical being tested is applied to these so-called precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) and the scientists then use various methods to evaluate the tissue's reaction. This includes identifying which genes might be expressed in the tissue, or determining which protein molecules are produced in greater abundance by the cells. Are any of them implicated in the immune response process, i.e. are they likely to trigger an allergic reaction? By examining the tissue under a microscope, it is possible to observe potential interactions between the cells and the immune system. Because the PCLS method is based on whole sections of tissue, the researchers can observe physiological processes in natural cell aggregates, almost exactly as they would occur during an immune response in the body.
At present, the scientists are using chemical substances already known to provoke an allergic reaction, as a means of refining the PCLS method. But they soon intend to start testing many other substances that have not been evaluated before. These in-vitro tests performed in a culture vessel require far fewer animals merely enough to harvest the lung tissue. The main beneficiaries of Sens-it-iv will be industry cosmetics, textiles, pharmaceuticals and public authorities in charge of monitoring occupational health and safety.
FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT
Hansastraße 27C
80686 Muenchen
http://www.fraunhofer.de
Visit our allergy section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/93072.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/93072.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Nurse Suffers Occupational Chemical Toxicity
posted by Rene' Scarpa on 7 Jan 2008 at 8:42 pmI want to applaud the efforts outlined in this article, toward improving the scientific methods and research reliabilty with regards to identifying chemical agents that may have a propensity to cause great harm. As discussed in this article, there are countless chemicals that impact us every day and we are generally under the mistaken belief that these chemicals have been researched thoroughly and deemed safe for all.
I had a recent "reality check", relative to a chemical toxicity I experienced, as a result of a chemical exposure within the hospital I have been employed by for 10 years. I have been a Registered Nurse for 17 years and I am currently 46 years old. I transferred to the Operating Room approx. 3 years ago. Within a few weeks of my occupational environment change to the OR, I began experiencing recurrent health problems.
Several incidents of extreme chest pressure with associated right arm numbness/pain landed me in the ICU for an overnight stay. I was prescribed several cardiac medications. Although unpleasant, I learned to live with the associated medication side effects. Several months later, after another severe episode, I was transferred to a cardiac care unit for several days, multiple tests, to include cardiac catheterization. The testing resulted in clearing me, relative to any cardiac dysfunction. I was given a discharge diagnosis of esophageal spasms with unknown etiology .
After 2 years of various testing, with my symptoms becoming progressively worse, including aspiration pneumonia and atypical seizures . I was ultimately diagnosed by an allergy specialist, as toxic from the disinfectant chemicals utilized in our Surgical department . At it's most severe, I couldn't even tolerate being in my personal physician's exam room, as I reacted to the wipes they used to disinfect the exam bed. None of my other coworkers have experienced the severe reactions that I have.
Thus, I support the belief that certain individuals may truly have more of a propensity than others to experience severe allergic reactions to commonly used chemicals. My chemical toxicity has totally altered my career focus. It has forced me to leave a patient care setting and move into nursing administration. I feel fortunate that my carreer afforded me alternatives, but I would fear that others may not be as fortunate. If I would have had better resources and information available to me, I would have certainly acted earlier to limit further exposures. I greatly hope that this research will help define the allergic reactivity and long term effects associated with many the chemicals we utilize freely in our society, often with no apparent consideration or concern to potential risks involved.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




