React Responsibly Rizla - And Put Cannabis Health Warnings On Your Products, UK
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsAlso Included In: Smoking / Quit Smoking
Article Date: 05 Feb 2008 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (7 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
As the government debates the classification of cannabis, mental health charity Rethink has today issued a stark warning to rolling paper manufacturer Rizla: accept that some of your products are used for smoking cannabis and take responsibility for warning people of the mental health risks by printing cannabis health warnings on the packaging.
The demand comes on the back of startling new research by the charity highlighting the general public's continued ignorance of the mental health effects of smoking cannabis. Rethink's report, Educating Reefer, shows:
- Nearly half of people (46%) think that cannabis is better for you than alcohol
- 1 in 4 think that cannabis is better for you than coffee
- Classification makes no difference to how much people use cannabis 1
- More people think king-size Rizla papers are used for cannabis than for tobacco 2
Jane Harris, Rethink's head of campaigns, said that it was time for rolling paper manufacturers - and the government - to start taking their responsibilities seriously.
"Rizla are being irresponsible by not including mental health warnings on their products when we know that they're used for cannabis. Health warnings work: 12% of people quit smoking as a result of warnings on cigarette packets.
"At the same time the government should stop wasting time and money debating classification and put its resources into a public education campaign on the mental health risks of cannabis use. In particular this should be targeted at young people, as they are most vulnerable to psychosis after cannabis use. Our research shows that young people want this information - we think they should receive it as a right."
Rethink will today give oral and written evidence to the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which is reviewing the classification of cannabis.
Meanwhile, Rethink supporters across the country have been sending letters and emails to Imperial Tobacco Limited calling for health warnings to be put on king-size Rizla packaging.
1. To view the report Educating Reefer go to http://www.rethink.org/educatingreefer
2. Rethink carried out a survey. In response to the question: "In your experience which, if any, of the following do people use king size rolling papers for (eg Rizla)?", 50% said cannabis and 49% said tobacco.
In the 25-34 age range this rose to 65% saying cannabis and 46% saying tobacco. To see the full findings go to http://www.rethink.org/educatingreefer
(These figures are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1,994 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 30th November - 3rd December 2007. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all GB adults (aged 18+).)
3. Rethink wrote to Imperial Tobacco Limited asking for health warnings to be included on the packaging of Rizla king-size. In its response, Imperial Tobacco Limited said:
"We are aware that rolling papers and loose tobacco may be utilised in connection with cannabis use. We do not condone such activities, nor endorse the use of any of our products for such purposes…..Imperial Tobacco complies with all government regulations concerning the content, size and format of health warnings that are required to be printed on packs, advertisements or elsewhere."
About Rethink
Rethink, the leading national mental health membership charity, works to help everyone affected by severe mental illness recover a better quality of life. We aim to provide hope and empowerment through effective services and support to all those who need us and campaign for change through greater awareness and understanding.
For further information on the charity and its work, visit: http://www.rethink.org or call 0845 456 0455.
The Mental Health Shop was created by two leading mental health charities, Rethink and Mental Health Media, and features an array of books, leaflets, DVD's and videos on a range of mental health topics including recovery, treatment and discrimination. This unprecedented collaboration now allows for a 'one stop shop' combining a range of mental health publications and products.Visit http://www.mentalhealthshop.org
http://www.rethink.org
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/95780.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/95780.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Health Warnings And Responsibilities On Cannabis
posted by Peter O'Loughlin on 6 Feb 2008 at 3:51 amThis writer's first reaction to the the views expressed by Release, is ' What a shame they did not, in common with many other 'advisory agencies' so elequontly express their opinions of the dangers of cannabis, when discussions regarding its downgrading were taking place
David Blunkett's politically expedient reasons for downgrading cannabis were masked by his ambigous phrase of 'relative harms', thus implying that it was more or less harmless.
The reclassification of cannabis will not in any way alleviate the damage caused by Blunkett;s cycnical and disastrous decison, nor will it affect ongoing use. What is required is a hard hitting campaign of the dangers of cannabis, promised by another Home Seceretary, but like so many of this Governments announcements, came to nothing.
Insofar as Rizla are concerned they, like the distillers are marketing a perectly legitimate product; in common with the latter the misuse of it is not their responsibility. If it is considered that warnings on Rizla's products would make any difference, then it would be relatively simple for the Government to instruct them to use the appropiate health warnings, much in the same way that health warnings on cigarrettes are mandatory.
Whether or not the latter, together with the draconian laws on smoking has worked is dubious, as is the assertion that 12% of people have quite smoking as a result of health warnings. Statistically only 3% per cent of those who quit smoking stay stopped. The DoH is unable to provide any statistics for those who have quit after just six weeks, who have remained abstainers 3, 6, 9 or 12 months later.
The truth is that people are still smoking despite illberal, and in some cases false evidence to coerce them into quiiting; proof of this is easily obtained by checking with retailers who sell cigarettes. Further proof is that in 2006-7 H.M customs siezed in excess of illegally imported 9 million cigarettes, and 3 thousand kilos of hand rolled tobacco. Whilst that is testimony to their survellience abilities, they would be the first to say, 'its the tip of the iceberg'.
We will never be able to stop people using drugs that they believe helps them to feel or cope better; we can however mount effective prevention campaigns for those who are yet to start.. Proven evidence based campaigns, that have worked in the USA for adolescents, can be downloaded free of charge from the National Institute for Drug Abuse. (NIDA) Why we don't implement rather than the wishy washy rubbish which currently passes for 'drug education' in our schools is the outcome of so called 'liberal thinking' preaching the gospel "that many people can use psycho active subsrances without harm". Or at least that's what the Royal Society of Arts would have us believe based on what they refer to as 'substantil evidence'. The evidence they refer to is of course the unreliable, and inaccurate British Crime Survey of 47,000 people in a population of 50 million. Not only an insufficient sample, but since it does not include those under 16, totally irrelevent in respect of drug use and subsequent damage caused.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





