Republican Presidential Candidates Discuss Appointment Of Former Supreme Court Justice O'Connor In Debate
Main Category: AbortionAlso Included In: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 01 Feb 2008 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Republican presidential candidates on Wednesday in a televised debate at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, Calif., discussed their views on U.S. Supreme Court appointments, including the appointment of former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Washington Post reports.
The candidates were asked whether former President Reagan made the right choice in appointing O'Connor to the Supreme Court even though her later rulings conflicted with the views of abortion-rights opponents. According to the Post, neither Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) nor former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said they would criticize Reagan for the appointment (Shear/Eilperin, Washington Post, 1/31).
McCain said, "I'm proud of Sandra Day O'Connor as a fellow Arizonan," adding that the judges he would appoint "are along the lines" of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, who "have a proven record of strict interpretation of the Constitution." Huckabee said that "history will have to determine" if O'Connor was a good appointment, adding that he will "always make every decision, always, on the side of life, every time I could, without equivocation."
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said he would "favo[r]" justices like Roberts, Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, adding, "I like justices that follow the Constitution, do not make law from the bench. I would have much rather had a justice of that nature." Rep. Ron Paul (Texas) said that he would not have appointed O'Connor because he "would have looked for somebody that I would have seen a much stricter constitutionalist" (Debate transcript, 1/30). The debate was sponsored by CNN, The Politico and the Los Angeles Times (Washington Post, 1/31).
McCain Should Outline Views on Supreme Court, Opinion Piece Says
McCain should consider providing ''straight talk'' about his views on Alito and Supreme Court appointments, Chicago Sun-Times columnist Robert Novak writes in an opinion piece. According to Novak, some members of the Republican Party who are "uncomfortable" with McCain as their presidential nomine recently said that he has "privately suggested" that Alito is "too conservative."
Although McCain has disputed the remarks and said that Alito was a "magnificent" appointment, McCain sometimes "says things off the cuff that he sometimes cannot remember exactly," Novak writes. If McCain receives the Republican nomination, he will need "very conservative" voters to support him, Novak writes, adding that some Republican Party members would like McCain to assure them he will not "emulate" former presidents Ford and George H.W. Bush in nominating "liberal justices" (Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, 1/31).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2007 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/95828.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/95828.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
What A Wierd Way Of Questioning
posted by Elizabeth F Cole MD on 5 Feb 2008 at 12:31 pmWhat on earth was this circuitous line of questioning related to Reagan's appointment of Judge Sandra Day O'connor.? Was this to find out about how appointments of female judges are to be avoided (because "they" are apt to create new laws from the bench vs strict adherence to the Constitution). Or was this also an opportunity to find out if anyone wanted (dared) to stray from the strictly Republican viewpoint of what a Supreme Court Judge should be like. Exactly like. And especially re abortion. Take your choice.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




