House Subcommittee Investigates Advertisements For Cholesterol Medication Lipitor
Main Category: CholesterolAlso Included In: Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry
Article Date: 11 Feb 2008 - 7:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.4 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.67 (3 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations on Thursday sent letters to advertising agencies believed to be involved with a television ad campaign for the cholesterol medication Lipitor, manufactured by Pfizer, that features Robert Jarvik, inventor of the first artificial heart, the New York Times reports. The effort is aimed at requesting information about payments made to individuals who might have served as stunt doubles for Jarvik, according to the Times. In the letters, committee Chair John Dingell (D-Mich.) and subcommittee Chair Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) wrote that the subcommittee has begun an investigation of "false and misleading statements and the use of celebrity endorsements of prescription medications in direct-to-consumer advertising."
In an ad that aired from March 2006 to July 2006, Jarvik appears to row a boat, but, according to the Times, a Seattle man served as a stunt double for him. The man, Dennis Williams, has declined to comment, but a newsletter published by a rowing club to which he belongs reported on his role as a stunt double for Jarvik in the ad.
The subcommittee investigation seeks to determine whether stunt doubles for Jarvik appeared in other ads. Stupak said, "We are taking a hard look at the deceptive tactics of drug companies in their direct-to-consumer advertising" (Saul, New York Times, 2/8).
Broader Debate
According to the Times, the ads mark a "rare instance of a well-known doctor's endorsing a drug in advertising -- and it has helped rekindle a smoldering debate over whether it is appropriate to aim ads for prescription drugs directly at consumers."
In a recent letter to Pfizer, Dingell raised concerns that the ads could mislead the public because they portray Jarvik, who is not a licensed cardiologist, as a medical expert. Dingell said, "It seems that Pfizer's number one priority is to sell lots of Lipitor, by whatever means necessary, including misleading the American people." Pfizer has defended the accuracy of the ads (Saul, New York Times, 2/7).
PBS' "NewsHour with Jim Lehrer" on Thursday included a discussion with Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest, and Gail Shearer, director of health policy analysis for Consumers Union, about the ads ("NewsHour with Jim Lehrer," PBS, 2/7). Audio of the segment is available online. Video and a transcript will be available Friday afternoon.
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our cholesterol section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/96807.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/96807.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Leave The Man Alone!
posted by Linda DeLia on 13 Feb 2008 at 6:51 amSo . . . Dr. Robert Jarvik is not a cardiologist? SO WHAT! He has made an invaluable contribution to treating heart disease by inventing the artificial heart. And he IS a physician, so he probably knows plenty about cholesterol. I'm only a medical editor, and I know a lot, too.
It makes no difference at all to me whether he had a stunt double rowing that boat. It's an advertisement, for heaven's sake! The public aren't complete idiots and can make some assessments for themselves. I'll read the scientific studies of Lipitor (which are largely positive). If the drug companies make money, great. They will stay in business and create more life-saving drugs. I have lymphoma, and if Genentech hadn't had a lot of money to create Rituxan, I'd be dead now.
Congress should find something else to do with its time. Let's see . . . what else is there?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





